10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on May 14, 2001
FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) of
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to
Commission File No. 1-11986
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
NORTH CAROLINA 56-1815473
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(336) 292-3010
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
7,918,911 shares of Common Stock,
$.01 par value, outstanding as of May 1, 2001
1
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
Index
Part I. Financial Information
Page Number
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000 3
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000 5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 9
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal proceedings 17
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 17
Signatures 18
2
3
4
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
5
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2001
(Unaudited)
1. Business
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., a fully-integrated, self-administered,
self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), develops, owns and operates
factory outlet centers. The factory outlet centers and other assets of the
Company's business are held by, and all of its operations are conducted by,
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise,
the term the "Company" refers to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and the
term "Operating Partnership" refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership.
The terms "we", "our" and "us" refer to the Company or the Company and the
Operating Partnership together, as the context requires.
2. Basis of Presentation
Our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared pursuant to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes thereto of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the
Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") rules and regulations, although
management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading.
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the
opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
interim financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring
nature.
3. Development of Rental Properties
During the first quarter of 2001, we opened 47,000 square feet of expansion
space in our center in San Marcos, Texas. Currently, we have an additional
50,000 square feet under construction in San Marcos, which is scheduled to open
during the third quarter of 2001.
Commitments to complete construction of the expansions to the existing
properties and other capital expenditure requirements amounted to approximately
$1.3 million at March 31, 2001. Commitments for construction represent only
those costs contractually required to be paid by us.
Interest costs capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000
amounted to $371,000 and $238,000, respectively.
6
4. Long-Term Debt
On February 9, 2001, the Operating Partnership issued $100 million of 9.125%
senior, unsecured notes, maturing on February 15, 2008. The net proceeds of $97
million were used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under our $75
million 8.75% notes which were due March 11, 2001. The net proceeds were also
used to repay the $20 million LIBOR plus 2.25% term loan due January 2002 with
Fleet National Bank and Bank of America. The interest rate swap agreements
associated with this loan were terminated at a cost of $295,200 which has been
included in interest expense. In addition, approximately $180,000 of unamortized
costs were written off as an extraordinary item. The remaining proceeds were
used for general operating purposes.
On March 26, 2001, we entered into a five year collateralized loan with Wells
Fargo Bank for $24.0 million at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 1.75%. The
proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under existing lines of credit.
Additionally on March 26, 2001, we extended the maturity date of our existing
$29.5 million term loan with Wells Fargo Bank from July 2005 to March 2006.
On May 1, 2001, we entered into an eight year collateralized loan with John
Hancock Insurance Company for $19.45 million at a fixed rate of 7.98%. The
proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under existing lines of credit.
At March 31, 2001, we had revolving lines of credit with an unsecured borrowing
capacity of $100 million, of which $78.6 million was available for additional
borrowings.
5. Accounting Change - Derivative Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2001, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities", as amended by FAS 137 and FAS 138 (collectively, "FAS 133"). The
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle related to the adoption
of FAS 133 resulted in the recognition of a $216,500 loss, net of minority
interest of $83,000, to accumulated other comprehensive income on the date of
adoption. As discussed in Note 4, certain interest rate swap agreements were
terminated during the quarter and the other comprehensive loss totaling
$106,000, net of minority interest of $41,000, recognized at adoption relating
to these agreements was reclassified to earnings. In accordance with the
provisions of FAS 133, our sole remaining interest rate swap agreement has been
designated as a cash flow hedge and is carried on the balance sheet at fair
value. At March 31, 2001, the fair value of the hedge is recorded as a liability
of $588,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2001, the change in the fair
value of the remaining derivative instrument was recorded as a $314,000 loss,
net of minority interest of $121,000, to accumulated other comprehensive income.
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2001 is as
follows (in thousands):
7
6. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators in computing earnings per share in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes options to purchase
common shares when the exercise price is greater than the average market price
of the common shares for the period. Options excluded for the three months ended
March 31, 2001 and 2000 totaled 1,246,870 and 1,280,840, respectively. The
assumed conversion of preferred shares to common shares as of the beginning of
the year would have been anti-dilutive. The assumed conversion of the
partnership units held by the minority interest limited partner as of the
beginning of the year, which would result in the elimination of earnings
allocated to the minority interest, would have no impact on earnings per share
since the allocation of earnings to a partnership unit is equivalent to earnings
allocated to a common share.
8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited,
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical
results and percentage relationships set forth in the unaudited, consolidated
statements of operations, including trends which might appear, are not
necessarily indicative of future operations.
The discussion of our results of operations reported in the unaudited
consolidated statements of operations compares the three months ended March 31,
2001 with the three months ended March 31, 2000. Certain comparisons between the
periods are made on a percentage basis as well as on a weighted average gross
leasable area ("GLA") basis, a technique which adjusts for certain increases or
decreases in the number of centers and corresponding square feet related to the
development, acquisition, expansion or disposition of rental properties. The
computation of weighted average GLA, however, does not adjust for fluctuations
in occupancy which may occur subsequent to the original opening date.
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements made below are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend for such forward-looking
statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and included
this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe
our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use
of the words "believe", "expect", "intend", "anticipate", "estimate", "project",
or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since
they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are,
in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect our actual
results, performance or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results to
differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to, the
following:
- - general economic and local real estate conditions could change (for
example, our tenant's business may change if the economy changes, which
might effect (1) the amount of rent they pay us or their ability to pay
rent to us, (2) their demand for new space, or (3) our ability to renew or
re-lease a significant amount of available space on favorable terms;
- - the laws and regulations that apply to us could change (for instance, a
change in the tax laws that apply to REITs could result in unfavorable tax
treatment for us);
- - availability and cost of capital (for instance, financing opportunities may
not be available to us, or may not be available to us on favorable terms);
- - our operating costs may increase or our costs to construct or acquire new
properties or expand our existing properties may increase or exceed our
original expectations.
General Overview
At March 31, 2001, we owned 29 centers in 20 states totaling 5.3 million square
feet compared to 31 centers in 22 states totaling 5.2 million square feet at
March 31, 2000. Since March 31, 2000, we have expanded five centers, increasing
GLA by approximately 277,000 square feet. In addition, we sold two centers
totaling 186,000 square feet during June 2000.
9
During the first quarter of 2001, we opened 47,000 square feet of expansion
space in our center in San Marcos, Texas. Currently, we have an additional
50,000 square feet under construction in San Marcos, which is scheduled to open
during the third quarter of 2001.
A summary of the operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and
2000 is presented in the following table, expressed in amounts calculated on a
weighted average GLA basis.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2001 to the three months ended
March 31, 2000
Base rentals increased $820,000, or 5%, in the 2001 period when compared to the
same period in 2000. The increase is primarily due to the effect of the
expansions completed since March 31, 2000 in the five centers mentioned above in
the General Overview. Base rent per weighted average GLA increased by $.10 per
square foot from $3.38 per square foot in the first three months of 2000
compared to $3.48 per square foot in the first three months of 2001. The
increase is the result of the expansions and the sale of the Lawrence, Kansas
and McMinnville, Oregon centers in June 2000 which had a lower average base rent
per square foot compared to the portfolio average.
10
Percentage rentals, which represent revenues based on a percentage of tenants'
sales volume above predetermined levels (the "breakpoint"), decreased $102,000,
and on a weighted average GLA basis, decreased $.02 per square foot in 2001
compared to 2000. For the three months ended March 31, 2001, reported same-store
sales, defined as the weighted average sales per square foot reported by tenants
for stores open since January 1, 2000, decreased by 3% when compared to the
first three months of 2000. This decrease is due in part to the negative impact
of severe winter weather on tenant sales, particularly at our centers located in
the northeast and the effect of the San Marcos, TX expansion on that center's
existing-store sales. Reported same-space sales for the rolling twelve months
ended March 31, 2001, defined as the weighted average sales per square foot
reported in space open for the full duration of each comparison period,
increased to $284, or 5%, reflecting the continued success of the our strategy
to re-merchandise selected centers by replacing low volume tenants with high
volume tenants.
Expense reimbursements, which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of
certain common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional,
advertising and management expenses generally fluctuates consistently with the
reimbursable property operating expenses to which it relates. Expense
reimbursements, expressed as a percentage of property operating expenses,
decreased from 94% in 2000 to 87% in 2001 primarily as a result of increases in
certain non-reimbursable expenses.
Other income decreased $423,000 in 2001 compared to 2000 primarily due to the
recognition of $493,000 in business interruption insurance proceeds relating to
the Stroud, Oklahoma center in 2000. The business interruption insurance
proceeds were received when the Stroud center was destroyed by a tornado in May
1999 and were fully amortized by June 2000.
Property operating expenses increased by $1,258,000, or 17%, in the 2001 period
as compared to the 2000 period and, on a weighted average GLA basis, increased
$.22 per square foot from $1.44 to $1.66. The increases are the result of
certain increases in real estate tax assessments, property insurance premiums
and higher common area maintenance expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased $308,000, or 17%, in the 2001
period as compared to the 2000 period. Also, as a percentage of total revenues,
general and administrative expenses increased from 7% to 8% in the 2000 period
compared to the 2001 period and, on a weighted average GLA basis, increased $.05
per square foot from $.34 in 2000 to $.39 in 2001.
Interest expense increased $971,000 during 2001 as compared to 2000 due
primarily to our long-term strategy to replace short-term, variable rate debt
with long-term collateralized, fixed rate debt and extend our average debt
maturities. Also, $295,200 paid to terminate certain interest rate swap
agreements during 2001 contributed to the increase in interest expense.
Depreciation and amortization per weighted average GLA increased from $1.25 per
square foot in the 2000 period to $1.37 per square foot in the 2001 period due
to a higher mix of tenant finishing allowances included in buildings and
improvements which are depreciated over shorter lives (i.e., over lives
generally ranging from 3 to 10 years as opposed to other construction costs
which are depreciated over lives ranging from 15 to 33 years).
The extraordinary loss recognized in the 2001 period represents the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs related to debt that was extinguished with
a portion of the February 2001 bond offering proceeds prior to its scheduled
maturity.
11
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.5 million and $9.6 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decrease in
cash provided by operating activities is due primarily to an increase in
interest expense in 2001 when compared to 2000. Net cash used in investing
activities was $6.7 and $2.4 million during 2001 and 2000, respectively. Cash
used was higher in 2001 primarily due to the increase in cash paid for expansion
activities and due to $4.0 million received in insurance proceeds relating to
the Stroud center in 2000. Net cash used in financing activities amounted to
$2.2 million and $7.5 million during the first three months of 2001 and 2000,
respectively.
During the quarter, we added 47,000 square feet to the portfolio in San Marcos,
TX. In addition, we currently have approximately 50,000 square feet of expansion
space under construction in San Marcos that is scheduled to open during the
third quarter of 2001. Commitments to complete construction of the expansions to
the existing properties and other capital expenditure requirements amounted to
approximately $1.3 million at March 31, 2001. Commitments for construction
represent only those costs contractually required to be paid by us.
We are in the early permitting and leasing stages for the development of up to
400,000 square foot outlet center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. This center
is being developed by Tanger-Warren Development, LLC ("Tanger-Warren"), a joint
venture that was formed in August 2000 to identify, acquire and develop sites
for us. Based on anticipated successful permitting and pre-leasing, we expect
stores to begin opening in late 2002.
We have an option to purchase the retail portion of a site at the Bourne Bridge
Rotary in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Based on tenant demand, we plan to develop a
new 250,000 square foot outlet center. The entire site will contain more than
750,000 square feet of mixed-use entertainment, retail, office and residential
community built in the style of a Cape Cod Village. The local and state planning
authorities are currently reviewing the project and final approvals are
anticipated by the end of 2001. Due to the extensive amount of site work and
road construction, stores are not expected to open until mid 2003.
The developments or expansions that we have planned or anticipated may not be
started or completed as scheduled, or may not result in accretive funds from
operations. In addition, we regularly evaluate acquisition or disposition
proposals and engage from time to time in negotiations for acquisitions or
dispositions. We may also enter into letters of intent for the purchase or sale
of properties. Any prospective acquisition or disposition that is being
evaluated or which is subject to a letter of intent may not be consummated, or
if consummated, may not result in accretive funds from operations.
On February 9, 2001, the Operating Partnership issued $100 million of 9.125%
senior, unsecured notes, maturing on February 15, 2008. The net proceeds of $97
million were used to repay all of the outstanding indebtedness under our $75
million 8.75% notes which were due March 11, 2001. The net proceeds were also
used to repay the $20 million LIBOR plus 2.25% term loan due January 2002 with
Fleet National Bank and Bank of America. The interest rate swap agreements
associated with this loan were terminated at a cost of $295,200 which has been
included in interest expense. In addition, approximately $180,000 of unamortized
costs were written off as an extraordinary item. The remaining proceeds were
used for general operating purposes.
On March 26, 2001, we entered into a five year collateralized loan with Wells
Fargo Bank for $24.0 million at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 1.75%. The
proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under existing lines of credit.
Additionally on March 26, 2001, we extended the maturity date of our existing
$29.5 million term loan with Wells Fargo Bank from July 2005 to March 2006.
12
On May 1, 2001, we entered into an eight year collateralized loan with John
Hancock Insurance Company for $19.45 million at a fixed rate of 7.98%. The
proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under existing lines of credit.
We intend to retain the ability to raise additional capital, including public
debt as described above, to pursue attractive investment opportunities that may
arise and to otherwise act in a manner that we believe to be in our best
interest and our shareholders' interests. We maintain revolving lines of credit
that provide for unsecured borrowings up to $100 million, of which $78.6 million
was available for additional borrowings at March 31, 2001.
After giving effect to the February 2001 debt offering, the Operating
Partnership and the Company under joint registration, could issue up to $100
million in additional equity securities. We are currently in the process of
amending our shelf registration for the ability to issue up to $200 million in
debt and equity securities, respectively. This process will be completed during
the second quarter of 2001. We may also consider selling certain properties that
do not meet our long-term investment criteria as well as outparcels on existing
properties to generate capital to reinvest into other attractive investment
opportunities. Based on cash provided by operations, existing credit facilities,
ongoing negotiations with certain financial institutions, the February 2001 bond
offering and funds available under the shelf registration, we believe that we
have access to the necessary financing to fund the planned capital expenditures
during 2001.
At March 31, 2001, approximately 55% of our outstanding long-term debt
represented unsecured borrowings and approximately 63% of our real estate
portfolio was unencumbered. The average interest rate, including loan cost
amortization, on average debt outstanding for the three months ended March 31,
2001 was 8.9%.
We anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and
administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment of
dividends in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short and long term.
Although we receive most of our rental payments on a monthly basis,
distributions to shareholders are made quarterly and interest payments on the
senior, unsecured notes are made semi-annually. Amounts accumulated for such
payments will be used in the interim to reduce the outstanding borrowings under
the existing lines of credit or invested in short-term money market or other
suitable instruments. Certain of our debt agreements limit the payment of
dividends such that dividends will not exceed funds from operations ("FFO"), as
defined in the agreements, for the prior fiscal year on an annual basis or 95%
of FFO on a cumulative basis from the date of the agreement.
On April 12, 2001, our Board of Directors declared a $.61 cash dividend per
common share payable on May 15, 2001 to each shareholder of record on April 30,
2001, and caused a $.61 per Operating Partnership unit cash distribution to be
paid to the minority interests. The Board of Directors also declared a cash
dividend of $.5496 per preferred depositary share payable on May 15, 2001 to
each shareholder of record on April 30, 2001.
Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates.
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates
and prices, such as interest rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
13
We negotiate long-term fixed rate debt instruments and enter into interest rate
swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. The swaps
involve the exchange of fixed and variable interest rate payments based on a
contractual principal amount and time period. Payments or receipts on the
agreements are recorded as adjustments to interest expense. At March 31, 2001,
we had an interest rate swap agreement effective through January 2003 with a
notional amount of $25 million. Under this agreement, we receive a floating
interest rate based on the 30 day LIBOR index and pay a fixed interest rate of
5.97%. This swap effectively changes our payment of interest on $25 million of
variable rate debt to fixed rate debt for the contract period at a rate of
7.72%.
The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement represents the estimated
receipts or payments that would be made to terminate the agreement. At March 31,
2001, we would have paid approximately $588,000 to terminate the agreement. A 1%
decrease in the 30 day LIBOR index would increase the amount to be paid by us
$426,000 to approximately $1,014,000. The fair value is based on dealer quotes,
considering current interest rates.
The fair value of long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to market risk.
Generally, the fair value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest
rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The estimated fair value of our
total long-term debt at March 31, 2001 was $358.9 million and its recorded value
was $355.3 million. A 1% increase from prevailing interest rates at March 31,
2001 would result in a decrease in fair value of total long-term debt by
approximately $7.9 million. Fair values were determined from quoted market
prices, where available, using current interest rates considering credit ratings
and the remaining terms to maturity.
New Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities", as amended by FAS 137 and FAS 138, (collectively, "FAS
133"). FAS 133 was effective for all fiscal quarters of all fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2000; accordingly, we adopted FAS 133 on January 1,
2001. Upon adoption on January 1, 2001, we recorded a cumulative effect
adjustment of $216,500, net of minority interest of $83,000, in other
comprehensive income (loss). At March 31, 2001 in accordance with the provisions
of FAS 133, our sole interest rate swap agreement has been designated as a cash
flow hedge and is carried on the balance sheet at fair value. At March 31, 2001,
the fair value of the hedge is recorded as a liability of $588,000.
During 2000, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Accounting
Standards Executive Committee issued an exposure draft Statement of Position
("SOP") regarding the capitalization of costs associated with property, plant
and equipment. Under the proposed SOP, all property, plant and equipment related
costs would be expensed unless the costs are directly identifiable with specific
projects and general and administrative and overhead costs which are not payroll
or payroll related and not directly related to the project would be expensed as
incurred. The expected effective date of the final SOP is expected in 2002 and
currently we are evaluating the effects it may have on our results of operations
and financial position.
14
Funds from Operations
We believe that for a clear understanding of our consolidated historical
operating results, FFO should be considered along with net income as presented
in the unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report. FFO is presented because it is a widely accepted financial indicator
used by certain investors and analysts to analyze and compare one equity real
estate investment trust ("REIT") with another on the basis of operating
performance. FFO is generally defined as net income (loss), computed in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, before extraordinary
items and gains (losses) on sale of depreciable operating properties, plus
depreciation and amortization uniquely significant to real estate. We caution
that the calculation of FFO may vary from entity to entity and as such our
presentation of FFO may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of
other reporting companies. FFO does not represent net income or cash flow from
operations as defined by generally accepted accounting principles and should not
be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of operating
performance or to cash from operations as a measure of liquidity. FFO is not
necessarily indicative of cash flows available to fund dividends to shareholders
and other cash needs.
Below is a calculation of funds from operations for the three months ended March
31, 2001 and 2000 as well as actual cash flow and other data for those
respective periods (in thousands):
15
Economic Conditions and Outlook
The majority of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the impact of
inflation. Such provisions include clauses for the escalation of base rent and
clauses enabling us to receive percentage rentals based on tenants' gross sales
(above predetermined levels, which we believe often are lower than traditional
retail industry standards) that generally increase as prices rise. Most of the
leases require the tenant to pay their share of property operating expenses,
including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and advertising
and promotion, thereby reducing exposure to increases in costs and operating
expenses resulting from inflation.
While factory outlet stores continue to be a profitable and fundamental
distribution channel for brand name manufacturers, some retail formats are more
successful than others. As typical in the retail industry, certain tenants have
closed, or will close, certain stores by terminating their lease prior to its
natural expiration or as a result of filing for protection under bankruptcy
laws.
As part of our strategy of aggressively managing our assets, we are
strengthening the tenant base in several of our centers by adding strong new
anchor tenants, such as Polo, Nike, GAP, Tommy Hilfiger and Nautica. To
accomplish this goal, stores may remain vacant for a longer period of time in
order to recapture enough space to meet the size requirement of these upscale,
high volume tenants. As of March 31, 2001, our centers were 95% occupied.
Approximately 29% of our lease portfolio is scheduled to expire during the next
two years. Approximately, 675,000 square feet of space is up for renewal during
2001 and approximately 868,000 square feet will come up for renewal in 2002. If
we were unable to successfully renew or release a significant amount of this
space on favorable economic terms, the loss in rent could have a material,
adverse effect on our results of operations.
As of March 31, 2001, we have renewed approximately 325,000 square feet, or 48%
of the square feet scheduled to expire in 2001. The existing tenants have
renewed at an average base rental rate approximately 7% higher than the expiring
rate. We also re-tenanted 101,000 square feet of vacant space during the first
three months of 2001 at an 8% increase in the average base rental rate from that
which was previously charged. Consistent with our long-term strategy of
remerchandising centers, we will continue to hold space off the market until an
appropriate tenant is identified. While we believe this strategy will add value
to our centers in the long-term, it may reduce our average occupancy rate in the
near term.
16
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership is presently involved in any
material litigation nor, to their knowledge, is any material litigation
threatened against the Company or the Operating Partnership or its properties,
other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and
which is expected to be covered by liability insurance.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 10.1 The senior indenture, dated as of March 1, 1996, among
Tanger Properties Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., a Guarantor, and State Street
Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee incorporated by reference
to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership Form 8-K dated
January 31, 2001.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the three months
ended March 31, 2001:
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2001 to file the press release
of the year ending December 31, 2000 financial results.
Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 16, 2001 to report the completion
of a 9.125% $100 million senior, unsecured bond offering due February 2008
by Tanger Properties Limited Partnership unconditionally guaranteed by
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
By: /s/ FRANK C. MARCHISELLO, JR.
----------------------------------
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
DATE: May 14, 2001
18