PRE 14A: Preliminary proxy statement not related to a contested matter or merger/acquisition
Published on March 29, 2007
UNITED
STATES
SECURITY
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ______ )
Filed
by
the Registrant [X]
Filed
by
a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check
the
appropriate box:
[X]
Preliminary Proxy Statement
[
] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only
(as
permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[
] Definitive Proxy Statement
[
] Definitive Additional Materials
[
] Soliciting Material Pursuant to
240.14a-12
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
(Name
of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name
of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]
No fee required
[
] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11
1)
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)
Total
fee paid:
[
] Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials.
[
] Check box if any part of the fee is offset
as provided by Exchange Act
Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number,
or
the Form or Schedule and the dae of its filing.
1)
Amount
Previously Paid:
2)
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)
Filing
Party:
4)
Date
Filed:
3200
NORTHLINE AVENUE, SUITE 360
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA 27408
PHONE:
336-292-3010
E-MAIL:
tangermail@tangeroutlet.com
NYSE:
SKT
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to
be held on May 18, 2007
Dear
Shareholders:
On
behalf
of the Board of Directors, I cordially invite you to attend the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. to be held on
Friday, May 18, 2007 at 10 o'clock a.m. at the O. Henry Hotel, 624 Green Valley
Road, Greensboro, North Carolina, (336) 854-2000, for the following
purposes:
1. |
To
elect directors to serve for the ensuing year;
|
2. |
To
ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending
December 31, 2007;
|
3. |
To
consider a proposal by the directors to amend the Company’s articles of
incorporation to increase the number of common shares authorized
for
issuance from 50 million common shares to 150 million common shares.
The
proposed amendment is set forth in full in the enclosed Proxy
Statement;
|
4. |
To
consider a proposal by the directors to amend the Company’s articles of
incorporation to create four new classes of preferred shares, each
class
having four million shares with a par value of $.01 per share and
to
increase the number of common shares authorized for issuance from
50 to
150 million common shares. The proposed amendment is set forth in
full in
the enclosed Proxy Statement; and,
|
5. |
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or
any adjournment(s) thereof.
|
Holders
of Class C Preferred Shares will be entitled to vote as a separate group on
Proposal #4 because Version Number One of the proposal involves issuance of
classes of preferred shares which may rank equally with the Class C Preferred
Shares with respect to payment of dividends or the distribution of assets upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up. Holders of Class C Preferred Shares
are
not entitled to vote on any other matters to be considered at the meeting.
Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2007 will be
entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. Information
concerning the matters to be considered and voted upon at the Annual Meeting
is
set out in the attached Proxy Statement. Our 2006 Annual Report for the year
ended December 31, 2006 is also enclosed.
It
is
important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting regardless
of
the number of shares you hold and whether or not you plan to attend the meeting
in person. Please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it
as soon as possible in the accompanying envelope. This will not prevent you
from
voting your shares in person if you subsequently choose to attend the
meeting.
Sincerely,
Stanley
K. Tanger
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
April
___, 2007
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
3200
NORTHLINE AVENUE, SUITE 360
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA 27408
PHONE:
336-292-3010
E-MAIL:
tangermail@tangeroutlet.com
NYSE:
SKT
____________
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to
be held on May 18, 2007
GENERAL
INFORMATION
The
Board
of Directors of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (NYSE:SKT), a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, referred to
as
a REIT, is soliciting your proxy for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of the Company to be held on Friday, May 18, 2007.
Unless
the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers to Tanger Factory
Outlet Centers, Inc., the term “Board” refers to our Board of Directors, the
term “meeting” refers to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be
held on May 18, 2007, and the term “Operating Partnership” refers to Tanger
Properties Limited Partnership. Our factory outlet centers and other assets
are
held by, and all of our operations are conducted by, the Operating Partnership.
Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are
also
descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating
Partnership. The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company
and the Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
The
proxy
materials are being mailed on or about April ___, 2007 to holders of record
of
our common shares, par value $.01 per share (referred to as the “Common
Shares”), and to holders of record of our Class C Preferred Shares, on March 29,
2007. Any shareholder who does not receive a copy of the proxy materials may
obtain a copy at the meeting or by contacting Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.,
Secretary of our Company (phone number: 336-834-6834). Our principal executive
offices are located at 3200 Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North
Carolina 27408.
Date,
Time and Place
We
will
hold the meeting on Friday, May 18, 2007 at 10 o'clock a.m. at the O. Henry
Hotel, 624 Green Valley Road, Greensboro, North Carolina, (336) 854-2000,
subject to any adjournments or postponements.
Who
Can Vote; Votes per share
All
holders of record of the Common Shares as of the close of business on the record
date, March 29, 2007, are entitled to attend and vote on all proposals at the
meeting. Each Common Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote. At the
close
of business on March 15, 2007, 31,260,161 Common Shares were issued and
outstanding.
All
holders of record of the Class C Preferred Shares will be entitled to vote
as a
separate group on Proposal #4 to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation
to create four new classes of preferred shares and to increase the Company’s
authorized Common Shares. Holders of Class C Preferred Shares are not entitled
to vote on any other matters to be considered at the meeting. Each Class C
Preferred Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote. At the close of
business on March 15, 2007, 3,000,000 Class C Preferred Shares were issued
and
outstanding.
1
How
to Vote
Common
Shares and Class C Preferred Shares represented by a properly executed proxy
will be voted as directed on the proxy card. To be voted, proxies must be filed
with the Secretary of the Company prior to voting.
If
your
shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent,
Computershare Trust Company, NA, you are considered, with respect to those
shares, the “shareholder of record”. If your shares are held in a stock
brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered, with
respect to those shares, the “beneficial owner” of those shares held in street
name and you have the right to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee
how
to vote on your behalf. Brokerage firms and other nominees have the authority,
under New York Stock Exchange rules at the time of this Proxy Statement, to
vote
Common Shares for the beneficial owner on certain “routine” matters for which
you do not provide voting instructions.
Proposals
#1, #2 and #3 above are considered routine matters and where no specification
is
made on the properly executed and returned form of proxy, the shares will be
voted FOR
the
election of all nominees for director, FOR
the
ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered
accounting firm and FOR
the
amendment to the articles of incorporation to increase the number of Common
Shares authorized. Proposal #4 to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation
to create four new classes of preferred shares and to increase the number of
authorized Common Shares is not considered a routine matter and where the broker
or nominee has not received specific voting instructions from the beneficial
owner of the shares with respect to that proposal, the brokerage firm or nominee
cannot vote FOR or AGAINST the proposal for the beneficial owner. This is called
a “broker non-vote”.
Quorum
and Voting Requirements
Under
the
Company’s By-Laws and North Carolina law, shares represented at the meeting by
proxy for any purpose will be deemed present for quorum purposes for the
remainder of the meeting. Directors will be elected by the vote of a plurality
of the votes cast by the Common Shares entitled to vote in the election,
provided that a quorum is present. Accordingly, Common Shares which are present
at the meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted in the election
of
directors will not affect the election of the candidates receiving a plurality
of the votes cast by the Common Shares entitled to vote in the election at
the
meeting. Approval of Proposals #2, #3 and #4 by the holders of Common Shares
may
be by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against the
Proposal by the Common Shares. The holders of Class C Preferred Shares are
entitled to vote as a separate group on and only on Proposal #4 to amend the
Company’s Articles of Incorporation to create four new classes of preferred
shares and to increase the Company’s authorized Common Shares. Approval of the
Proposal by the Class C Preferred Shares may be by the affirmative vote of
a
majority of the votes cast for or against the Proposal by the Class C Preferred
Shares. Approval of any other proposal to come before the meeting requires
the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against the proposal
by
the Common Shares unless the North Carolina Business Corporation Act requires
that the proposal be approved by the affirmative vote of a percentage of the
votes entitled to be cast on the proposal. If a proposal may be approved by
the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, abstentions,
broker non-votes and shares which are present at the meeting for any other
purpose but which are not voted on a particular proposal will not affect the
outcome of the vote on the proposal.
Revocation
of Proxies
You
may
revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by filing a notice of such
revocation, by filing a later dated proxy with the Secretary of the Company
or
by voting in person at the meeting. You cannot revoke your proxy by merely
attending the meeting. If you dissent, you will not have any rights of appraisal
with respect to the matters to be acted upon at the meeting.
Proxy
Solicitation
We
will
bear the costs of soliciting proxies from the holders of our Common Shares
and
Class C Preferred Shares. Initially, we will solicit proxies by mail. We have
retained the services of Georgeson Shareholder to assist in the solicitation
of
proxies for a fee of $6,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. Our directors,
officers and employees may also solicit proxies by telephone, telegraph, fax,
e-mail or personal interview. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and
other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them
in
sending proxy material to shareholders.
2
PROPOSAL
1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The
Company’s By-Laws provide that directors be elected at each Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Pursuant to such By-Laws, our Board has fixed the number of
directors to be elected at this year’s meeting at six. The persons named as
proxies in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote in favor of the
election of the six nominees for director designated below, all of whom are
presently directors of the Company, to serve until the next Annual Meeting
of
Shareholders and until their successors are elected and shall qualify. It is
expected that each of these nominees will be able to serve, but if any such
nominee is unable to serve for any reason, the proxies reserve discretion to
vote or refrain from voting for a substitute nominee or nominees. All directors
of the Company serve terms of one year or until the election of their respective
successors.
Information
Regarding Nominees (as of March 15, 2007)
Name
|
Age
|
Present
Principal Occupation or
Employment
and Five-Year Employment History
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
|
83
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since
March 3, 1993. Mr. Tanger opened one of the country's first outlet
shopping centers in Burlington, N.C. in 1981. He was the founder
and Chief
Executive of the Company's predecessor formed in 1981 until its business
was acquired by the Company in 1993.
|
Steven
B. Tanger
|
58
|
Director
of the Company since May 13, 1993. President and Chief Operating
Officer
since January 1995; Executive Vice President from 1986 to 1994. Mr. Tanger
joined the Company's predecessor in 1986 and is the son of Stanley
K.
Tanger.
|
Jack
Africk
|
78
|
Director
of the Company since June 4, 1993. Managing Partner of Evolution
Partners,
LLC since June 1993. President and Chief Operating Officer of North
Atlantic Trading Company from January 1998 to December 1998.
|
William
G. Benton
|
61
|
Director
of the Company since June 4, 1993. Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Salem Senior Housing, Inc. since May 2002. Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Benton Investment Company
since 1982. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Health
Equity Properties, Inc. from 1987 to September 1994.
|
Thomas
E. Robinson
|
59
|
Director
of the Company since January 21, 1994. Managing Director of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company (formerly Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.) since June
1997. Director (May 1994 to June 1997), President (August 1994 to
June
1997) and Chief Financial Officer (July 1996 to June 1997) of Storage
USA,
Inc.
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
72
|
Director
of the Company since August 23, 2004. Chairman of the Board of Ecolab,
Inc. from January 2000 to May 2006. President and Chief Executive
Officer
of Ecolab from March 1995 to July 2004 and President and Chief Operating
Officer from August 1992 to March
1995.
|
Vote
Required. The
nominees will be elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality
of those votes cast at the meeting; provided that a quorum is present.
Accordingly, abstentions, broker non-votes and Common Shares present at the
meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will
not
affect the outcome of the vote on the nominees unless the North Carolina
Business Corporation Act requires that the nominee be approved by a greater
number of affirmative votes than a plurality of the votes cast.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR ALL OF THE NOMINEES SET FORTH
ABOVE.
3
Director
Independence
Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines and the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange require that a majority of our directors must be independent directors
and every member of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee be independent. Generally,
independent directors are those directors who are not concurrently serving
as
officers of the Company and who currently have no material relationship to
us
that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from management
and
the Company. Our Board has affirmatively determined that the following nominees
to our Board are independent, as that term is defined under our Corporate
Governance Guidelines and the general independence standards in the listing
standards of the New York Stock Exchange: Jack Africk, William G. Benton, Thomas
E. Robinson and Allan L. Schuman. We presently have six directors, including
these four independent directors.
In
October 2005, we retained Legg Mason Wood Walker, a firm in which Mr. Robinson
served as a managing director at the time, to provide investment banking
services in connection with the offering of our Class C Preferred Shares, which
was completed in November 2005. We paid Legg Mason Wood Walker fees for its
service totaling $140,000. Mr. Robinson did not benefit personally from his
firm’s receipt of these fees and such fees were less than 0.5% of Legg Mason
Wood Walker’s total revenues during that year. The Board considered these fees
when evaluating Mr. Robinson’s independence and concluded that, given the facts
above, the amount of revenue received by Mr. Robinson’s employer would have no
impact on Mr. Robinson’s judgment when considering matters of the Company and
therefore, Mr. Robinson should be considered an independent director for
purposes of serving the entire Board. However, as Mr. Robinson may have not
been
considered “independent” under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Mr. Robinson voluntarily resigned from service on the Audit Committee
in
October 2005 and from service on the Share and Unit Option Committee in February
2006. Mr. Robinson is currently employed as a managing director of Stifel
Nicolaus & Company. We did not engage the services of, nor did we pay any
fees or compensation to, Stifel Nicolaus & Company during 2006.
Attendance
at Board Meetings
The
Board
held five regular and four special meetings during 2006. Each of the above
directors attended at least 75% of the meetings held during 2006 by the Board
and the committees of which he was a member. The non-management directors are
required to meet in executive sessions periodically, but no less than once
a
year. The non-management directors have designated Mr. Jack Africk to serve
as
Lead Director for purposes of presiding at the executive sessions. The
independent directors should meet in executive session at least once a year.
Our
policies for non-management and independent director executive sessions were
adopted with our Corporate Governance Guidelines in 2004. The Company does
not
have a formal policy of attendance for directors at our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. All of our directors attended the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
in 2006, except Mr. Schuman. Mr. Schuman was unable to attend because the annual
shareholders’ meeting of Ecolab Inc, of which he was the chairman of the board
at the time, was held on the same date.
Committees
of the Board
The
Board
has four standing committees to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution
of its responsibilities. The committees are currently the Audit Committee,
the
Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and
the Share and Unit Option Committee. In accordance with New York Stock Exchange
listing standards, all of the committees are comprised solely of non-employee,
independent directors. Charters for audit, compensation, and nominating and
corporate governance committees are available on the Company’s website at
www.tangeroutlet.com
by first
clicking on “OUR COMPANY”, then “FINANCIALS” and then “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE”.
The table below shows current membership for each of the standing
committees.
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
Share
and Unit Option
Committee
|
Jack
Africk
|
Jack
Africk (Chair)
|
Jack
Africk
|
Jack
Africk
|
William
G. Benton (Chair)
|
William
G. Benton
|
William
G. Benton
|
William
G. Benton (Chair)
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
Thomas
E. Robinson
|
Thomas
E. Robinson (Chair)
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
4
Audit
Committee.
The
Board has established an Audit Committee consisting of three of our independent
directors. The purpose of the Audit Committee is (i) to assist the Board in
fulfilling its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements,
the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the
qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent registered public
accountants and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public
accountants and the Company’s internal audit function and (ii) to prepare any
audit committee reports required by the Securities Exchange Commission to be
included in the Company’s annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is
directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight
of the work of the Company’s independent registered public accountants and
approves in advance, or adopts appropriate procedures to approve in advance,
all
audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public
accountants. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee
is
“financially literate”, as that term is defined in the listing requirements of
the New York Stock Exchange, and that each member of the committee is an “audit
committee financial expert”, as that term is defined in Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K. During 2006, there were five meetings of the Audit
Committee.
Compensation
Committee.
The
Board has established a Compensation Committee consisting of our four
independent directors. The Compensation Committee is charged with determining
compensation for our chief executive officer and making recommendations to
the
Board with respect to the compensation of other officers. During 2006, there
were five meetings of the Compensation Committee.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee. The
Board
has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting
of
our four independent directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee makes recommendations to the Board of changes in the size of the
Board
or any committee of the Board, recommends individuals for the Board to nominate
for election as directors, recommends individuals for appointment to committees
of the Board, establishes procedures for the Board’s oversight of the evaluation
of the Board and management, and develops and recommends corporate governance
guidelines.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates annually the
effectiveness of the Board as a whole and identifies any areas in which the
Board would be better served by adding new members with different skills,
backgrounds or areas of experience. The Board considers director candidates
based on a number of factors including: whether the Board member will be
“independent” in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and as such
term is defined by the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements; personal
qualities and characteristics, accomplishments and reputation in the business
community; experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable
size
and current knowledge and contacts in the Company’s industry or other industries
relevant to the Company’s business; experience and understanding of the
Company’s business and financial matters affecting its business; ability and
willingness to commit adequate time to Board and committee matters; the fit
of
the individual’s skills and personality with those of other directors and
potential directors in building a Board that is effective, collegial and
responsive to the needs of the Company; and diversity of viewpoints, background,
experience and other demographics. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee does not have a policy on the consideration of board nominees
recommended by shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
believes that such a policy is not necessary in that it will consider nominees
based on a nominee's qualifications, regardless of whether the nominee is
recommended by shareholders. See "Other Matters - Shareholder Proposals and
Nominations" in this Proxy Statement.
During
2006, there was one meeting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
Share
and Unit Option Committee.
The
Board has established a Share and Unit Option Committee (referred to as the
"Option Committee") consisting of three of our independent directors. The Option
Committee administers our Incentive Award Plan which provides for the issuance
of equity-based awards to the Company’s employees and directors. The Option
Committee selects the employees to whom equity-based awards under the Incentive
Award Plan will be granted and establishes the terms and conditions of the
awards based on recommendations and advice from the Compensation Committee.
During 2006, there was one meeting of the Option Committee.
5
Shareholder
Communications with Directors
Any
shareholder may send communications to the Board and individual members of
the
Board by sending a letter by mail addressed to the Board of Directors (or an
individual director) c/o Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., 3200 Northline
Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, Attn: Corporate Secretary.
Compensation
of Directors
During
2006, our independent directors were paid an annual compensation fee of $20,000
and a per meeting fee of $1,500 ($500 for telephone meetings) for each Board
meeting and each committee meeting attended. In addition, the Lead Director
and
the chairman of the Audit Committee were paid an annual compensation fee of
$10,000 and the chairman of each other committee was paid an annual compensation
fee $7,500. The Board decided not to increase any of their fees during 2007.
Our
employees who are also directors will not be paid any director fees for their
services as directors of the Company.
Upon
approval of the entire Board, we may from time to time under the Incentive
Award
Plan grant to any independent director options, restricted or deferred shares,
dividend equivalents or other awards. The Board selects the independent
directors to whom equity-based awards under the Incentive Award Plan will be
granted and establishes the terms and conditions of the awards based on
recommendations and advice from the Compensation Committee. Based on the advice
and recommendations of an independent compensation consultant retained by the
Compensation Committee, the Board approved an award to each independent director
of 2,500 restricted Common Shares during 2006, 2,000 restricted Common Shares
during 2005 and 750 restricted Common Shares during 2004. The restrictions
on
the shares shall cease to apply with respect to one-third of the shares which
are the subject of each grant, and those shares will vest, on each December
31st
following
the date of grant. Dividends are paid on the restricted Common Shares from
the
date of the grant. All future grants of restricted Common Shares to independent
directors will be the subject of a separate grant by the Board.
The
total
2006 compensation for our independent directors is shown in the following table.
Name
|
Fees
Earned
or
Paid
In
cash
|
Share
Awards
(1)
|
Option
Awards
(2)
|
All
Other
Compensation
(3)
|
Total
|
Jack
Africk
|
$66,500
|
$42,943
|
$4,339
|
$5,152
|
$118,934
|
William
Benton
|
$56,500
|
$42,943
|
$4,339
|
$5,152
|
$108,934
|
Thomas
Robinson
|
$43,500
|
$42,943
|
$4,339
|
$5,152
|
$95,934
|
Allan
Schuman
|
$35,000
|
$40,058
|
$3,727
|
$4,896
|
$83,681
|
(1)
|
The
amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of restricted Common
Shares awards recognized for financial reporting purposes for the
fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006 in accordance with FAS 123 (R) and includes
awards granted in and prior to 2006. Unvested restricted Common Shares
for
each director as of December 31, 2006 were as follows: 667 restricted
Common Shares granted during 2005 with a grant date fair value of
$22.58
per share, 1,334 restricted Common Shares granted during 2006 with
a grant
date fair value of $28.74 per share and 334 restricted Common Shares
granted during 2006 with a grant date fair value of $32.08 per share.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of option awards
recognized for financial reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 in accordance with FAS 123 (R) and thus includes
awards
granted prior to 2006. Options related to the amounts above were
awarded
during 2004 and had a grant date fair value of $2.17 per option for
Mr.
Africk, Mr. Benton and Mr. Robinson and $3.11 per option for Mr.
Schuman.
Aggregate options outstanding for each director as of December 31,
2006
were 40,000 for Mr. Africk; 22,000 for Mr. Benton; 12,000 for Mr.
Robinson
and 6,000 for Mr. Schuman.
|
(3)
|
Represents
dividends paid during 2006 on unvested restricted Common Share
awards.
|
6
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The
Compensation Committee of the Board, which is composed entirely of independent
directors, is charged with determining compensation for our Chief Executive
Officer (referred to as the “CEO”) and making recommendations to the Board with
respect to the compensation of our other officers. Mr. Africk, Mr. Benton,
Mr.
Robinson and Mr. Schuman currently serve on the Compensation Committee, with
Mr.
Africk serving as chairman. No executive officer of the Company served as a
member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity
that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or
the
Compensation Committee.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The
purposes and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee of the Board include
the following:
· |
Review
and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation
of
the CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance and determine and approve the
CEO's compensation level based on this
evaluation,
|
· |
Make
recommendation to the Board with respect to the compensation of
independent directors and officers other than the
CEO,
|
· |
Periodically
review the Company’s incentive-compensation and equity-based plans and
approve any new or materially amended equity-based plan,
and
|
· |
Oversee,
with management, regulatory compliance with respect to compensation
matters including the Company’s compensation policies with respect to
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (referred to
as the
“Code”).
|
Compensation
Program Objectives and Rewards
The
objectives of the Company’s compensation program are as follows:
· |
To
attract, retain and motivate qualified executive management who are
enthusiastic about the Company’s mission and
culture.
|
· |
Create
a fair, reasonable and balanced compensation program that rewards
management’s performance and contribution to the Company while closely
aligning the interests of management with those of
shareholders.
|
· |
Provide
total compensation to executive officers which is competitive with
total
compensation paid by other REITs, and other private real estate firms
similar to the Company.
|
What
Our Compensation Program is Designed to Reward
The
Company’s compensation program is designed to reward both teamwork and the
individual officer’s contribution to the Company with respect to annual and
longer-term goals. Annual cash performance-based incentives reward both Company
financial and individual performance for the fiscal year. In measuring an
individual executive officer’s and the overall team’s performance, the
Compensation Committee considers numerous factors including the Company’s growth
in funds from operations from the prior year, its dividend payout ratio, the
success in renewing a significant amount of the leases expiring during the
year,
increases obtained in tenant base rents upon executing renewals or new leases,
occupancy rate maintained at year end, increase in tenant sales and the overall
total return to shareholders. While the individual amounts of compensation
incentives paid may vary among officers, the targets that are set are generally
the same for all officers, thereby creating an environment where all officers
work together to achieve a common goal. Equity-based awards provide long-term
incentives designed to reward price appreciation of the Company’s Common Shares
over a five-year period.
7
Elements
of Compensation
Historically,
the Company’s primary components of compensation for its executive officers have
been base salary, annual incentive cash bonuses and long-term equity-based
incentive compensation. There is no pre-established policy or target for the
allocation between cash and non-cash incentive compensation.
Since
2004, the Compensation Committee has engaged the services of an outside
compensation consultant, the SMG Advisory Group, LLC, to assist it in
determining the proper amounts, types and mix of compensation to executive
officers in order to achieve the overall objectives as described above. With
the
help of the consultant, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the
compensation practices of other REITs and develops a compensation plan which,
to
a certain extent, is based on benchmarking peer group total compensation levels,
while maintaining the link between corporate performance and shareholder wealth
creation.
Within
the framework of aligning total compensation with corporate and individual
performance, each of the components are evaluated as follows:
· |
Annual
base salaries are designed to provide the executive with a minimum
compensation level consistent with the individual’s position and duties
relative to his or her peers.
|
· |
Annual incentive
cash bonuses are designed to reward the executive for the achievement
of
strategic and financial goals of the Company during each fiscal year.
In
conjunction with the executive’s base salary, the Company attempts to keep
total cash compensation within the Company’s fiscal year budget while
reinforcing its pay-for-performance
philosophy.
|
· |
Long-term
incentives are designed to closely align the interests of management
with
those of shareholders. The long-term incentives granted to executives
are
evaluated on an annual basis and the terms of the awards are considered
relevant to the length of the employment contract and/or performance
period.
|
· |
The
Company seeks to maintain a competitive total compensation package
that
aligns the economic interest of the executives with that of shareholders
while maintaining sensitivity to multiple factors including the Company’s
fiscal year budget, annual accounting cost and the impact to share
dilution.
|
In
selecting the targeted peer group, the Company considers REITs based upon the
following characteristics: (i) industry sector, (ii) market capitalization,
(iii) peer group continuity from year to year and (iv) peer group utilized
for
Common Share performance measurement. The peer group that was selected for
2006
includes the following REITs: Acadia Realty Trust, CBL & Associates
Properties, Inc. Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, Equity One, Inc.,
Federal Realty Investment Trust, Glimcher Realty Trust, Kimco Realty
Corporation, National Retail Properties, Inc., New Plan Excel Realty Trust,
Inc., Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc., Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust,
Realty Income Corporation, Regency Centers Corporation, Simon Property Group,
Inc., Taubman Centers, Inc., The Macerich Company, Urstadt Biddle Properties,
Inc., and Weingarten Realty Investors.
The
Compensation Committee annually reviews tally sheets that set forth the
company’s total compensation obligations to the CEO and the other officers. In
setting compensation each year, the Compensation Committee considers, and these
tally sheets include, the executive’s realized compensation from the prior year
and targeted compensation for the coming year.
The
Compensation Committee also reviews the recommendations of the Company’s CEO,
Mr. Stanley K. Tanger, with respect to the Company’s compensation programs,
practices and packages for executives, other employees and directors. Mr. Tanger
makes annual recommendations to the Compensation Committee of the base salaries,
bonus targets and equity compensation for the executive team and other
employees. The Compensation Committee will consider, but is not bound by and
does not always accept, Mr. Tanger’s recommendations with respect to executive
compensation.
8
2006
Compensation
When
determining the specific amounts of compensation to be provided to the executive
officers during 2006, in addition to all of the factors and elements described
above, the Compensation Committee noted that the Company had achieved a number
of its specific goals for the 2005 fiscal year. For the year ending December
31,
2005, as compared to year ending December 31, 2004, our funds from operations
(referred to as “FFO”), excluding non-recurring charges, increased 11% to an all
time high of $70.0 million and increased 6% on a per share basis. FFO represents
income before extraordinary items and gains (losses) on sale or disposal of
depreciable operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization uniquely
significant to real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships
and joint ventures. For a further discussion of FFO, please see our 2006 Annual
Report under the section “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-Funds from Operations”. Our market
capitalization increased 30% to $1.8 billion, average tenant sales per square
foot, on a comparable basis, increased 3% to $320, and average base rental
rates
on leases released and renewed during the year increased 7% and 6%,
respectively. In addition, our total return to shareholders during 2005 was
in
excess of 14% and our year end occupancy rate was 97%, marking the
25th
consecutive year we have achieved a year end occupancy rate at or above 95%.
In
addition, the Company successfully raised a material amount of capital in the
form of additional Common Shares, Class C Preferred Shares and additional
unsecured debt in the public markets totaling approximately $381 million in
proceeds which were used to close a major acquisition in December 2005 and
to
retire certain mortgage loans with interest rates ranging from 7.875% to
7.98%.
Base
Salary
Given
the
Company’s success during 2005, the Compensation Committee recommended that the
salaries of the CEO, the Chief Operating Officer (referred to as the “COO”), and
Chief Financial Officer (referred to as the “CFO”), be increased during 2006 by
10% and that the salaries of all other executive officers be left to the
discretion of the CEO and COO. Based upon the recommendations of the Company’s
compensation consultants, the CEO and COO approved a 5% increase in the salaries
of each of the other executive officers. The Compensation Committee believed
that each executive officer’s base salary compensation was fair compared to his
or her comparable position within the peer group. Each of the named executive
officers has an employment agreement with the Company that includes a provision
whereby the executive’s base salary shall not be less than certain previous
amounts. See "Employment Contracts" in this Proxy Statement.
Annual
Cash Incentives
Effective
for 2006, all executive officers were eligible for an annual incentive cash
bonus payment based upon achieving certain performance criteria during the
year.
The performance criteria were approved and set by the Compensation Committee
at
the beginning of the fiscal year. The annual incentive cash bonus for a fiscal
year is typically paid in the first quarter of the following year once the
results for the year have been audited.
Annual
incentive cash bonuses are determined upon an evaluation of a combination of
corporate and individual performance measures. Corporate performance measures
account for 85% of each executive’s annual bonus with the remaining 15% based on
the achievement of individual performance criteria as determined by the
Compensation Committee. The measures used for corporate performance
include:
· |
Growth
of FFO per share over previous year
(20%)
|
· |
Achievement
of the Company’s strategic business plan
(25%)
|
· |
Payout
ratio targets (20%)
|
· |
Total
shareholder return relative to a selected peer group
(20%)
|
The
Compensation Committee, at its discretion, may adjust the predetermined FFO
targets to exclude significant non-recurring charges.
Each
executive’s annual incentive cash bonus amount is based upon Threshold, Target,
and Maximum performance measurements, each equal to a percentage of base salary.
See the 2006 Grant of Plan Based Awards table below for the dollar amounts
payable under each of these categories. Generally, executives must be employed
as of the last day of the year to receive payment under the annual incentive
cash bonus plan for that year.
9
Annual
incentive cash bonus targets were as follows for 2006:
Named
Executive Officer
|
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
Stanley
K. Tanger, CEO
|
75%
|
100%
|
150%
|
Steven
B. Tanger, COO
|
75%
|
100%
|
135%
|
Frank
C. Marchisello, Jr. CFO
|
75%
|
100%
|
125%
|
Joseph
Nehmen, Senior Vice President - Operations
|
5%
|
10%
|
15%
|
Lisa
Morrison, Senior Vice President - Leasing
|
5%
|
10%
|
15%
|
In
2006,
the Company surpassed the target levels but did not achieve the maximum
performance targets. Actual bonus amounts paid during 2007 for 2006 performance,
based on the metrics described above, were 138.08% of target for Mr. Stanley
K.
Tanger, 126.43% for Mr. Steven B. Tanger, 118.66% for Mr. Marchisello, and
11.89% for both Mr. Nehmen and Ms. Morrison.
Ms.
Morrison also participates in a separate incentive cash bonus program designed
to reward the Company’s leasing employees for successfully executing new leases
and renewing existing leases with our tenants. Management believes it is
desirable for all leasing employees to participate in this plan in order to
provide incentives for maximizing and growing the Company’s revenues. Per the
terms of her employment contract, Ms. Morrison is eligible to receive an annual
incentive cash bonus equal to the lesser of (1) 75% of her salary or (2) the
average of the bonuses received by certain leasing employees who report directly
to her. Ms. Morrison receives the higher of the bonus as calculated under the
Company’s incentive cash bonus plan for executive officers or the bonus
calculated under the terms of her employment contract, but not both. During
2006, Ms. Morrison received a cash bonus based on the terms of her employment
contract in the amount of $79,271.
Long-Term
Incentives
Long
term
incentives are determined based on peer group compensation practices combined
with recommendations of management and the Compensation Committee. The Company’s
long-term incentive compensation consists of equity-based awards under its
Incentive Award Plan, either in the form of restricted Common Shares or options
to acquire Common Shares at a predetermined price. Equity-based awards deliver
increased value only when the value of the Company’s Common Shares increase.
The
Option Committee administers our Incentive Award Plan, which provides for the
issuance of equity-based awards to our officers and employees. The Compensation
Committee makes recommendations and provides advice and information to the
Option Committee with respect to equity-based awards. The Option Committee
makes
the awards and establishes the terms and conditions of the awards, including
voting, as it deems appropriate.
Restricted
Common Share Awards
On
February 28, 2006, the Option Committee awarded 72,000 restricted Common Shares
to Mr. Stanley K. Tanger, 48,000 restricted Common Shares to Mr. Steven B.
Tanger and 20,000 restricted Common Shares to Mr. Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
These awards were identical to the awards made in 2005, except that Mr.
Marchisello’s award was increased by 10,000 shares. In addition, the
Compensation Committee recommended that the Option Committee make awards of
restricted Common Shares to other executive officers based upon the
recommendations of the CEO and COO. Based on such recommendations and consistent
with the advice of the Compensation Committee and its outside compensation
consultants, the Option Committee awarded 2,000 restricted Common Shares to
each
of the other executive officers.
In
setting the amounts and terms of the restricted Common Shares, the Compensation
Committee and the Option Committee consider the value of previous grants of
restricted Common Shares and the total compensation expense recognized in the
Company’s financial statements with respect to all previous grants of restricted
Common Shares. The total annual expense recognized during 2006 for all such
grants is included in the Summary Compensation Table below. However, the Option
Committee does not necessarily limit the number of shares to be granted based
on
the total value or annual expense recognized in the financial statements because
the Committees generally consider grants of restricted Common Shares to
represent both an annual reward for individual and Company performance achieved
for the most recently completed fiscal year as well as a longer-term incentive
for future performance. Restricted Common Shares are generally granted during
the first quarter of the current year once the results from the previous year
are finalized.
10
The
restricted Common Shares granted to the executive officers during 2006 vest
and
the restrictions cease to apply on twenty percent of the award on each
anniversary date of the grant over a five-year period, beginning on February
28,
2007. Dividends are paid on all restricted Common Shares whether vested
or unvested. The Option Committee believes that restricted Common Share grants
with time-based vesting features provide the desired incentive to increase
the
Company’s share price and therefore the wealth of our shareholders over a 5-year
period. If the Company has poor relative performance that results in poor
shareholder returns, then the value of the restricted Common Shares, and
likewise the executive’s total compensation, will be reduced. If the Company has
superior relative performance that results in superior shareholder returns,
then
the value of the restricted Common Shares, and likewise the executive officer’s
total compensation, will be significantly increased.
The
Company measures the fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (referred to as “FAS 123(R)”) of all restricted
Common Share awards with time-based vesting features based on the provisions
of
the Incentive Award Plan. Under those provisions, fair value is considered
to be
the Company’s closing price of its Common Shares on the last trading day prior
to the grant date.
Common
Share Option Awards
During
2006, the Compensation Committee considered a recommendation from the
compensation consultants to grant options to acquire Common Shares to each
of
the executive officers. The Compensation Committee decided that no options
should be awarded since all of the executive officers were being awarded
restricted Common Shares.
Options
have not been utilized as a means of executive compensation since 2004. The
Compensation Committee does consider them, however, as a form of compensation
and includes them in its annual assessment of executive compensation.
When
awarded in the past, options were granted with an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of the Company’s Common Shares. Under the terms of the
Company’s Incentive Award Plan, the fair market value of the Company’s Common
Shares is considered to be the closing price on the last trading day prior
to
the grant date. The Company does not backdate options, grant options
retroactively, or coordinate grants of options so that they are made before
announcements of favorable information, or after announcements of unfavorable
information.
Retirement
Benefits
The
Company does not provide any retirement benefits to its executive officers,
other than matching a portion of employee contributions to a 401(k) plan. This
benefit is generally available to all employees of the Company.
On
November 3, 2006, Willard A. Chafin, age 68, the Company’s Executive Vice
President of Leasing, Operations and Marketing, retired after providing over
16
years of service. In consideration of Mr. Chafin's retirement, the Option
Committee approved the immediate vesting of Mr. Chafin's remaining unvested
options to acquire 7,500 units in the Operating Partnership (which were
exchangeable into 15,000 of the Company's Common Shares). As a result of the
accelerated vesting of Mr. Chafin's options, the Company recognized $236,917
as
additional compensation expense under FAS 123 (R) during the third quarter
of
2006. Mr. Chafin’s unvested restricted Common Shares were forfeited and he
received no other compensation upon his termination other than his base salary
and unused vacation time accrued through his termination date.
Employment
Contracts and Change in Control
The
Company’s business is competitive and the Compensation Committee believes that
it is extremely desirable for the Company to maintain employment contracts
with
its senior executives. The employment contracts generally provide for severance
pay if the executive terminates his employment for Good Reason or is terminated
by the Company without Cause, as defined in each agreement. The severance
arrangements provided in the contracts are designed to promote stability and
continuity of senior management. For certain executives, the employment
contracts consider a change in control as Good Reason for an executive to
terminate his or her employment, and thus would entitle him or her to certain
severance pay.
The
Company currently has employment contracts with each of the named executives
on
page 13 of this Proxy Statement. See “Employment Contracts” in this Proxy
Statement.
11
Perquisites
The
Company does not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to
executive officers, except that Mr. Stanley K. Tanger and Mr. Steven B. Tanger
are each given a monthly car allowance of $800 and the company pays the premiums
on life insurance polices for each executive totaling $17,500 for Mr. Stanley
K.
Tanger and $12,970 for Mr. Steven B. Tanger.
The
Company leases a fractional ownership in a corporate aircraft. The corporate
aircraft is made available for the personal use of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger because
the Company believes the security and efficiency benefits to the Company clearly
outweigh the expense. However, Mr. Stanley K. Tanger maintains a cash deposit
with the Company which is used to fully reimburse the Company for all related
costs of his personal use, including costs that are charged based on usage,
such
as flight costs and fuel costs, as well as a pro rata portion of any related
fixed costs, such as monthly management fees and lease rental payments. In
addition, depending on seat availability, Mr. Stanley K. Tanger’s family members
occasionally accompany him on the corporate aircraft during business trips,
at
no incremental cost to the Company.
Deductibility
of Executive Compensation
Subject
to certain limited exemptions, Section 162(m) of the Code denies an income
tax
deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to a "covered
employee" (which is defined as the CEO and each of the Company’s other four most
highly compensated officers) to the extent that such compensation in any
taxable
year of the employee exceeds $1 million. In addition to salaries, bonuses
payable to the Company’s executives under their present employment contracts and
compensation attributable to the exercise of options and other share-based
awards that may be granted under the Incentive Award Plan constitute
compensation subject to the Section 162(m) limitation. The Incentive Award
Plan
permits, but does not require, share-based awards to qualify as
"performance-based compensation" which is exempt from application of the
Section
162(m) limitation. It is the Company’s policy to take account of the
implications of Section 162(m) among all factors reviewed in making compensation
decisions. However,
the Compensation Committee, while considering tax deductibility as one of
its
factors in determining compensation, will not limit compensation to those
levels
or types of compensation that will be deductible, and accordingly, some portion
of the compensation paid to a Company executive may not be tax deductible
by the
Company under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee will, of course,
consider alternative forms of compensation, consistent with its compensation
goals, that preserve deductibility.
REPORT
OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
We
have
reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such
review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
THE
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
|
|
Jack
Africk (Chairman)
|
|
William
G. Benton
|
|
Thomas
E. Robinson
|
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
12
2006 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE (1)
Name
and
Principal
position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Share
Awards
(2)
|
Option
Awards
(2)
|
Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
|
All
Other
Compensation
|
Total
|
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
Chairman
and
Chief
Executive Officer
|
2006
|
$543,000
|
$1,067,009
|
$43,468
|
$749,774
|
$269,223(3)
|
$2,672,474
|
|
Steven
B. Tanger
President
and
Chief
Operating Officer
|
2006
|
$462,000
|
$711,339
|
$30,428
|
$584,084
|
$184,902(4)
|
$1,972,753
|
|
Frank
C. Marchisello
Executive
Vice President,
Chief
Financial Officer
|
2006
|
$318,000
|
$182,286
|
$10,867
|
$377,323
|
$41,274(5)
|
$929,750
|
|
Joe
Nehmen
Senior
Vice President,
Operations
|
2006
|
$268,000
|
$10,758
|
$8,694
|
$31,852
|
$4,790(6)
|
$324,094
|
|
Lisa
Morrison
Senior
Vice President,
Leasing
|
2006
|
$210,000
|
$10,758
|
$8,694
|
$79,271
|
$4,790(6)
|
$313,513
|
|
Retired
Willard
A. Chafin
Executive
Vice President,
Leasing
|
2006
|
$255,288
|
---
|
$244,990(7)
|
---
|
$4,790(6)
|
$505,068
|
(1)
|
No
bonus was paid to a named executive officer except as part of the
annual incentive cash bonus plan, a non-equity incentive
plan.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial
reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 in
accordance with FAS 123 (R) and thus may include awards granted in
and
prior to 2006. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating
these
values may be found in Note 13 to our 2006 audited financial statements
on
page F-27 of our annual report.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Stanley K. Tanger's other compensation includes a car allowance of
$9,600
as per the terms of his employment contract, term life insurance
premiums
totaling $17,500, dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Share
awards of $239,373 and a company match under an employee 401(k) plan
of
$2,750. In addition, Mr. Tanger is allowed to use the corporate aircraft
for his personal use. However, Mr. Tanger fully reimburses us for
all
related costs, including costs that are charged based on usage, such
as
flight costs and fuel costs, as well as a pro rata portion of any
related
fixed costs, such as monthly management fees and lease rental payments.
Mr. Tanger’s family members have occasionally accompanied him on the
corporate aircraft used during business trips, at no incremental
cost to
us.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Steven B. Tanger's other compensation includes a car allowance of
$9,600
as per the terms of his employment contract, term life insurance
premiums
totaling $12,970, dividends paid on unvested restricted Common Shares
of
$159,582 and a company match under an employee 401(k) plan of
$2,750.
|
(5)
|
Represents
dividends of $38,524 paid on unvested restricted Common Share awards
and a
company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $2,750.
|
(6)
|
Represents
dividends of $2,040 paid on unvested restricted Common Share awards
and a
company match under an employee 401(k) plan of $2,750.
|
(7)
|
Includes
incremental compensation cost of $236,917 recognized under SFAS 123(R)
as
a result of the accelerated vesting of Mr. Chafin's remaining unvested
options to acquire 15,000 Common Shares upon his retirement on November
3,
2006.
|
13
2006 GRANT OF PLAN BASED AWARDS
Name
|
Grant
Date (1)
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan
Awards
(2)
|
All
Other Share
Awards:
Number
of
Common Shares
or
Units (#) (3)
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards ($)
|
||
Threshold
|
Target
|
Maximum
|
||||
Stanley
K. Tanger
|
2/28/06
|
$407,250
|
$543,000
|
$814,500
|
72,000
|
$2,309,760
|
Steven
B. Tanger
|
2/28/06
|
$346,500
|
$462,000
|
$623,700
|
48,000
|
$1,539,840
|
Frank
C. Marchisello
|
2/28/06
|
$238,500
|
$318,000
|
$397,500
|
20,000
|
$641,600
|
Joe
Nehmen
|
2/28/06
|
$13,400
|
$26,800
|
$40,200
|
2,000
|
$64,160
|
Lisa
Morrison
(4)
|
2/28/06
|
$10,500
|
$21,000
|
$31,500
$157,500
|
2,000
|
$64,160
|
Retired
Willard
A. Chafin
(5)
|
2/28/06
|
$12,764
|
$25,529
|
$38,293
|
2,000
|
$64,160
|
(1)
|
The
date approved by the Board’s Compensation Committee or Option Committee
with respect to equity-based awards. Under the terms of our Incentive
Award Plan, the grant date fair value is considered to be the closing
price of the Company’s Common Shares on the day prior to the grant date,
which for the 2006 awards was $32.08.
|
(2)
|
These
columns show the range of estimated payouts targeted for 2006 performance
under our annual incentive cash bonus plan for our executive officers
as
described in the section titled “Annual Cash Incentives” in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The 2007 bonus payment for
2006
performance was based on the metrics described, at 138.08% of target
for
Mr. Stanley K. Tanger, 126.43% for Mr. Steven B. Tanger, 118.66%
for Mr.
Marchisello and 11.89% for Mr. Nehmen.
|
(3)
|
Restricted
Common Shares granted under our Incentive Award Plan are described
in the
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table below. Dividends
are
paid on unvested restricted Common Shares.
|
(4)
|
Per
the terms of her contract, Ms. Morrison is eligible to receive a
cash
bonus equal to the lesser of (1) 75% of her salary or (2) the average
of
the bonuses received by certain leasing employees who report directly
to
her. Ms Morrison receives the higher of the bonus as calculated under
our
annual incentive cash bonus plan for executive officers or the bonus
calculated under the terms of her employment contract, but not both.
During 2006, Ms. Morrison received a cash bonus based on the terms
of her
employment contract in the amount of $79,271.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Chafin’s non-equity incentive award and restricted Common Share award were
forfeited upon his retirement on
November 3, 2006
according to their terms.
|
14
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR END 2006
Name
and
Principal
position
|
Option
Awards
|
Share
Awards
|
||||||
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
(1)
|
Market
Value
of
Share
or
Units
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(1)(2)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(2)
|
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
|
---
|
60,000
(3)
|
$19.415
|
4/27/2014
|
48,000
(4)
21,600
(5)
72,000
(7)
|
$1,875,840
844,128
2,813,760
|
21,600
(6)
|
$844,128
|
Steven
B. Tanger
|
14,000
28,000
|
---
42,000
(3)
|
$9.3125
19.415
|
3/8/2010
4/27/2014
|
32,000
(4)
14,400
(5)
48,000
(7)
|
$1,250,560
562,752
1,875,840
|
14,400
(6)
|
$562,752
|
Frank
C. Marchisello
|
4,000
10,000
|
---
15,000
(3)
|
$11.0625
19.415
|
1/8/2009
4/27/2014
|
4,000
(4)
3,000
(5)
20,000
(7)
|
$156,320
117,240
781,600
|
3,000
(6)
|
$117,240
|
Joe
Nehmen
|
8,000
|
12,000
(3)
|
$19.415
|
4/27/2014
|
2,000
(7)
|
$78,160
|
||
Lisa
Morrison
|
---
|
12,000
(3)
|
$19.415
|
4/27/2014
|
2,000
(7)
|
$78,160
|
(1)
|
Represents
portion of restricted Common Shares that vest based on rendering
service
over a specific period of time.
|
(2)
|
Based
on the closing price of our Common Shares on December 29, 2006 of
$39.08.
|
(3)
|
Options
vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates on 4/27/2005,
4/27/2006, 4/27/2007, 4/27/2008 and 4/27/2009. Options expire 10
years
from grant date.
|
(4)
|
Restricted
Common Shares vest at the following rates per year: 15%, 15%, 15%,
15%,
20% and 20% on 6/15/2004, 12/15/2004, 12/15/2005, 12/15/2006, 12/15/2007
and 12/15/2008, respectively.
|
(5)
|
Restricted
Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates
on
12/31/2005, 12/31/2006, 12/31/2007, 12/31/2008 and
12/31/2009.
|
(6)
|
Represents
portion of the restricted Common Shares granted during 2005 that
vest upon
the satisfaction of performance criteria. Shares vest at the rate
of 20%
per year, subject to satisfaction of performance criteria for the
applicable year, with vesting dates of 12/31/2005, 12/31/2006, 12/31/2007,
12/31/2008 and 12/31/2009.
|
(7)
|
Restricted
Common Shares vest at a rate of 20% per year, with vesting dates
on
2/28/2007, 2/28/2008, 2/28/2009, 2/28/2010 and
2/28/2011.
|
15
OPTIONS EXERCISES AND COMMON SHARES VESTED IN 2006
Name
and
Principal
position
|
Option
Awards
|
Share
Awards
|
||
Number
of
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise (#)
|
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
|
Number
of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting (#)
|
Value
Realized
on
Vesting ($) (1)
|
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
|
40,000
|
$548,675
|
32,400
|
$1,266,192
|
Steven
B. Tanger
|
---
|
---
|
21,600
|
$844,128
|
Frank
C. Marchisello
|
8,000
|
$182,260
|
3,500
|
$136,780
|
Joe
Nehmen
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Lisa
Morrison
|
4,000
|
$52,583
|
---
|
---
|
Retired
Willard
A. Chafin
|
20,000
(2)
|
$316,302
|
---
|
---
|
(1)
|
Amounts
reflect the closing market price on the day prior to the vesting
date in
accordance with the terms of our Incentive Award Plan.
|
(2)
|
Includes
15,000 Common Shares under options which vesting was accelerated
at the
time of Mr. Chafin’s retirement on November 3, 2006.
|
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2006 with respect to
compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized
for issuance:
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Securities
to
be Issued Upon
Exercise
of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
|
Number
of
Securities
Remaining
Available
for Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
Excluding
Securities
Reflected
in Column
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
491,300
|
$18.20
|
1,895,370
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Total
|
491,300
|
$18.20
|
1,895,370
|
16
Employment
Contracts
Each
of
Stanley K. Tanger and Steven B. Tanger will receive annual cash compensation
in
the form of salary and bonus pursuant to a three-year employment contract
effective as of January 1, 2004. The employment contracts will be automatically
extended for one additional year on January 1 of each year unless the
executive’s employment is terminated, or we give written notice to the executive
within 180 days prior to such January 1 that the contract term will not be
automatically extended. The base salary provided for in such contracts may
be
increased but not decreased each year.
Upon
termination of employment, Stanley K. Tanger has agreed not to compete with
us
for the remainder of his life. Upon termination of employment, Steven B. Tanger
has agreed not to compete with us for one year (or three years if severance
compensation is received) within a 50 mile radius of the site of any commercial
property owned, leased or operated by us or within a 50 mile radius of any
commercial property which we negotiated to acquire, lease or operate within
the
six month period prior to termination. Each executive’s covenant not to compete
mandates that, during the term of his employment contract and during the
effective period of the covenant, such executive direct his commercial real
estate activities through us, with exceptions for development of properties
which were owned collectively or individually by them, by members of their
families or by any entity in which any of them owned an interest or which was
for the benefit of any of them prior to the Company’s initial public offering
(including the one factory outlet center with a total of 64,288 square feet
in
which Stanley K. Tanger, prior to the sale to a third party in February 2007,
was a 50% partner and a single shopping center in Greensboro, North Carolina
with a total of 24,440 square feet (the "Excluded Properties")). In no event
will either of the Tangers engage in the development, construction or management
of factory outlet shopping centers or other competing retail commercial property
outside of the Company or the Operating Partnership during the effective period
of the covenant not to compete (with the exception of the Excluded Properties).
In
addition, each executive will not engage in any active or passive investment
in
property relating to factory outlet centers or other competing retail commercial
property, with the exception of the ownership of up to one percent of the
securities of any publicly traded company.
If
the
employment of either of the Tangers terminates without Cause, as defined in
the
agreement, or such employment is terminated by the executive with Good Reason,
as defined in the agreement, the terminated executive shall receive a severance
benefit equal to 300% of the sum of (a) his annual base salary, (b) the higher
of (i) the prior year's annual bonus or (ii) the average annual bonus for the
preceding three years, and (c) his automobile allowance for the current year.
Share based awards under our Incentive Award Plan are included in the
calculation of the prior year’s annual bonus and average annual bonus. If
employment terminates by reason of death or disability, the executive or his
estate shall receive a lump sum amount equal to (a) his annual base salary
that
would have been paid for the remaining contract term if employment had not
terminated, plus (b) the executive's annual bonus which would have been paid
during the year of termination had employment not terminated, multiplied by
a
fraction the numerator of which is the number of days in the year prior to
termination and the denominator of which is 365.
The
employment contracts with Stanley K. Tanger and Steven B. Tanger also grant
them
certain registration rights with respect to the Common Shares that they
beneficially own.
Frank
C.
Marchisello, Jr. has a three-year employment contract effective January 1,
2004.
Mr. Marchisello’s contract will be automatically extended for one additional
year on January 1 of each year unless the executive’s employment is terminated,
or we give written notice to the executive within 180 days prior to such January
1 that the contract term will not be automatically extended. The base salary
provided for in Mr. Marchisello’s contract may be increased but not decreased
each year.
If
Mr.
Marchisello’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, he or
his estate will receive as additional compensation an amount equal to his annual
base salary and a pro rata portion of the annual bonus earned for the contract
year in which the termination occurs. Further, if Mr. Marchisello’s employment
is terminated by us without Cause, or by Mr. Marchisello for Good Reason, as
those terms are defined in the agreement, Mr. Marchisello will receive a
severance payment equal to 300% of the sum of (a) his annual base salary for
the
current contract year and (b) the higher of (i) the prior year's annual bonus
or
(ii) the average annual bonus for the preceding three years, to be paid monthly
over the succeeding 36 months. Share based awards under our Incentive Award
Plan
are included in the calculation of the prior year’s annual bonus and average
annual bonus.
17
Joseph
H.
Nehmen has a three year employment effective January 1, 2003. Mr. Nehmen’s
contract will be automatically extended for one additional year on January
1 of
each year unless the executive’s employment is terminated, or we give written
notice to the executive within 180 days prior to such January 1 that the
contract term will not be automatically extended. Mr. Nehmen’s base salary for
subsequent years in no event may be less than his annual base salary for the
previous contract year.
If
Mr.
Nehmen’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability, he or his
estate will receive as additional compensation an amount equal to his annual
base salary for the contract year in which the termination occurs. Further,
if
Mr. Nehmen’s employment is terminated by us without Cause, or by Mr. Nehmen for
Good Reason, as those terms are defined in the agreement, Mr. Nehmen will
receive a severance payment equal to 300% of his annual base salary for the
current contract year, to be paid monthly over the succeeding 36
months.
Lisa
J.
Morrison has an employment contract expiring December 31, 2007. Ms. Morrison’s
contract may be extended for additional one year periods by written agreement
by
both parties prior the end of the initial term or any extended term. The
contract established a base salary for calendar year 2006 of $210,000. Ms.
Morrison’s base salary for subsequent years shall not be less than $210,000. In
addition, Ms. Morrison will be paid a bonus each year equal to the lesser of
(i)
seventy-five percent (75%) of her base salary in effect on the last day of
such
calendar year and (ii) the average bonus, as defined in the agreement, paid
to
our employees who are leasing representatives.
During
the respective term of employment and for a period of one year thereafter (three
years in the case of Mr. Marchisello and Mr. Nehmen if the executive receives
a
severance payment of 300% of his annual base salary), each of Mr. Marchisello
and Mr. Nehmen is prohibited from engaging directly or indirectly in any aspect
of the factory outlet business within a radius of 50 miles of, or in the same
state as, any factory outlet center owned or operated by us. Ms. Morrison,
during the term of her employment and for a period of three months thereafter,
is prohibited from engaging in any activities involving developing or operating
a factory outlet shopping facility within a radius of 50 miles of any retail
shopping facility owned, operated or managed by us at any time during her
employment.
Stanley
K. Tanger and Steven B. Tanger are employed and compensated by both the
Operating Partnership and the Company. The Compensation Committee believes
that
the allocation of such persons' compensation between the Company and the
Operating Partnership reflects the services provided by such persons with
respect to each entity. The remainder of the employees are employed solely
by
the Operating Partnership.
Potential
Payments on Termination or Change in Control
The
table
below reflects the amount of compensation payable to each of our named executive
officers in the event of termination of such executive’s employment. The amount
of compensation payable to each named executive officer is shown in the table
below (1) upon termination by the Company without Cause or by the executive
for
Good Reason, (2) termination as a result of a Change in Control, (3) termination
as a result of death, (4) termination as result of Disability, and (5)
termination by the Company for Cause or by the executive without Good Reason.
The terms “Cause”, “Change in Control”, “Disability” and “Good Reason” are
defined in the employment contracts of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger, Mr. Steven B.
Tanger, Mr. Marchisello and Mr. Nehmen, and are generally as stated
below.
“Cause”
- The
Company shall have “Cause” to terminate the executive's employment upon the
executive’s (i) causing material harm to the Company through a material act of
dishonesty in the performance of his or her duties, (ii) conviction of a felony
involving moral turpitude, fraud or embezzlement, or (iii) willful failure
to
perform his or her material duties (other than a failure due to disability)
after written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure.
“Change
of Control”
- shall
mean (A) the sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (other than pursuant to
internal reorganization) by the Company or the Operating Partnership of more
than 50% of its assets to a single purchaser or to a group of associated
purchasers; (B) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction in which the
Company or the Operating Partnership does not survive as an independent,
publicly owned corporation or the Company ceases to be the sole general partner
of the Partnership; or (C) the acquisition of securities of the Company or
the
Operating Partnership in one or a related series of transactions (other than
pursuant to an internal reorganization) by a single purchaser or a group of
associated purchasers (other than the executive or any of his or her lineal
descendants, lineal ancestors or siblings) which results in their ownership
of
twenty-five (25%) percent or more of the number of Common Shares of the Company
(treating any Operating Partnership Units or Preferred Shares acquired by such
purchaser or purchasers as if they had been converted to Common Shares) that
would be outstanding if all of the Operating Partnership Units and Preferred
Shares were converted into Common Shares; (D) a merger involving the Company
if,
immediately following the merger, the holders of the Company's shares
immediately prior to the merger own less than fifty (50%) of the surviving
company's outstanding shares having unlimited voting rights or less than fifty
percent (50%) of the value of all of the surviving company's outstanding shares;
or (E) a majority of the members of the Company's Board of Directors are
replaced during any twelve month period by directors whose appointment or
election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to
the
date of the appointment or election.
18
“Disability”
- shall
mean the absence of the executive from the executive's duties to the Operating
Partnership and/or the Company on a full-time basis for a total of 16
consecutive weeks during any 12 month period as a result of incapacity due
to
mental or physical illness which is determined to be total and permanent by
a
physician selected by the Partnership or the Company and acceptable to the
executive or the executive's legal representative.
“Good
Reason”
- The
executive shall have Good Reason to terminate his or her employment upon the
occurrence of any of the following events:
· |
any
material adverse change in job titles, duties, responsibilities,
perquisites, or authority without his or her
consent;
|
· |
if,
after a Change of Control, either (i) the principal duties of the
executive are required to be performed at a location other than the
Greensboro, North Carolina metropolitan area (or New York, New York
in the
case of Mr. Steven B. Tanger) without his or her consent or (ii)
in the
case of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger and Mr. Steven B. Tanger, the executive
no
longer reports directly to the Board of
Directors;
|
· |
a
material breach of the employment agreement by
the Operating Partnership or Company, including without
limitation, the failure to pay compensation or benefits when due
if such
failure is not cured within 30 days after written demand for payment
thereof;
|
· |
the
executive’s election to terminate employment within the 180 day period
following a Change of Control; or
|
· |
in
the case of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger and Mr. Nehmen, the
relocation of the Company and/or the Operating Partnership headquarters
outside of the Greensboro, North Carolina metropolitan area without
his
consent;
|
· |
in
the case of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger and Mr. Steven B. Tanger, if the
executive is removed, or is not re-elected as a Director of the
Company.
|
The
employment contracts of Mr. Stanley K. Tanger, Mr. Steven B. Tanger, Mr.
Marchisello and Mr. Nehmen consider a change in control as Good Reason for
an
executive to terminate his or her employment, and thus would entitle him to
certain severance benefits. For purposes of the table below, however, we
consider the caption representing the termination by the Company without Cause
or by the executive for Good Reason to exclude an event of a change in control.
In addition, any severance benefits or additional compensation that these four
executives are eligible to receive upon termination will be reduced to the
extent necessary to prevent the executive from having any liability for the
federal excise tax levied on certain “excess parachute payments” under section
4999 of the Code. The amounts shown in the table below show the maximum amounts
the executives would be eligible to receive upon termination assuming no such
reduction in compensation or benefits would be required.
The
amounts shown below assume that such termination was
effective December 31, 2006, and thus amounts earned through such time are
estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon
termination. In addition, the amounts shown below assume that the
annual incentive cash bonus each executive was eligible to receive for
the 2006 fiscal year would have been earned but unpaid at December 31, 2006.
The
actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of such executive’s
separation from the Company.
19
Name
|
Cash
Severance
Payment
(1)
|
Share
Awards
(2)
|
Continuation
of
Benefits
(3)
|
All
Other
Comp.
(4)
|
Total
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
· Without
Cause or
For
Good Reason
· Change
in Control
· Death
· Disability
· For
Cause or without
Good
Reason
|
$9,346,152
9,346,152
1,835,774
1,835,774
749,774
|
$6,377,856
$7,557,756
$6,377,856
$6,377,856
---
|
$131,938
131,938
---
---
---
|
$34,300
34,300
---
34,300
---
|
$15,890,246
17,070,146
8,213,630
8,247,930
749,774
|
Steven
B. Tanger
· Without
Cause or
For
Good Reason
· Change
in Control
· Death
· Disability
· For
Cause or without
Good
Reason
|
$5,699,436
5,699,436
1,508,084
1,508,084
$584,084
|
$4,251,904
5,077,834
4,251,904
4,251,904
---
|
$14,010
14,010
---
---
---
|
$25,940
25,940
---
25,940
---
|
$9,991,290
10,817,220
5,759,988
5,785,928
584,084
|
Frank
C. Marchisello
· Without
Cause or
For
Good Reason
· Change
in Control
· Death
or Disability
· For
Cause or without
Good
Reason
|
$3,040,650
3,040,650
695,323
377,323
|
$1,172,400
1,467,375
1,172,400
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
$4,213,050
4,508,025
1,867,723
377,323
|
Joe
Nehmen
· Without
Cause or
For
Good Reason
· Change
in Control
· Death
or Disability
· For
Cause or without
Good
Reason
|
$804,000
804,000
299,852
31,852
|
$78,160
314,140
78,160
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
$882,160
1,118,140
378,012
31,852
|
Lisa
Morrison
· Without
Cause or
For
Good Reason
· Change
in Control
· Death
or disability
· For
Cause or without
Good
Reason
|
$79,271
79,271
79,271
79,271
|
$78,160
314,140
78,160
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
---
---
---
---
|
$157,431
393,411
157,431
79,271
|
(1)
|
The
terms of the cash severance payments due each officer under each
scenario
are more fully described elsewhere in this proxy statement under
the
caption “Employment Contracts”.
|
(2)
|
Amounts
shown in this column include the value of the unvested restricted
Common
Shares which would immediately vest upon termination of employment
based
on the closing price of our Common Shares on December 29, 2006
of $39.08.
This column also includes, upon a change in control as defined
in the
Incentive Award Plan, the value of any unvested options that would
become
immediately exercisable calculated as the difference of the price
of our
Common Shares on December 29, 2006 and the exercise price of each
unvested
option.
|
(3)
|
Includes
estimated costs of continuation of benefits for the remainder of
each
executive’s employment contract for group medical and dental coverage,
disability insurance and life insurance premiums on $100,000 of
coverage.
|
(4)
|
Represents
premiums on term life insurance polices for each executive to be
paid for
the remainder of each executive’s employment contract.
|
20
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The
following table sets forth certain information as of March 15, 2007, or such
other date as indicated in the notes thereto, available to us with respect
to
our Common Shares, and of units of partnership interests in the Operating
Partnership (the “Units”) (i) held by those persons known by us to be the
beneficial owners (as determined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the “SEC”) of more than 5% of such shares, (ii) held individually by
the directors and our executive officers named elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement, and (iii) held by our directors and all of our executive officers
as
a group.
Name
and Business Address (where required) of Beneficial
Owner
|
Number
of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
(1)
|
Percent
of
All
Common
Shares
|
Number
of
Common
Shares
Exchangeable
For
Units
Beneficially
Owned
(2)
|
Percent
of
All
Common
Shares
and
Units
|
Stanley
K. Tanger
(3)
Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
3200
Northline Avenue, Suite 360
Greensboro,
NC 27408
|
850,616
|
2.7%
|
6,086,610
|
18.5%
|
Steven
B. Tanger (4)
Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
110
East 59th
Street
New
York, NY 10022
|
260,595
|
*
|
56,000
|
*
|
FMR
Corp
(5)
82
Devonshire Street
Boston,
MA 02109
|
3,481,400
|
11.1%
|
---
|
9.3%
|
Deutsche
Bank AG (6)
RREEF
America, L.L.C.
Deutsche
Asset Management, Inc.
Deutsche
Bank Trust Corp. Americas
Deutsche
Investment Management Americas
Taunusanlage
12
D-60325
Frankfurt am Main
Federal
Republic of Germany
|
2,282,250
|
7.3%
|
---
|
6.1%
|
The
Vanguard Group, Inc. (7)
100
Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern,
PA 19355
|
2,214,221
|
7.1%
|
---
|
5.9%
|
Cohen
& Steers Inc.(8)
Cohen
& Steers Capital Management, Inc.
Houlihan
Rovers SA
280
Park Avenue, 10th
Floor
New
York, NY 10017
|
2,203,286
|
7.0%
|
---
|
5.9%
|
Jack
Africk
(9)
|
63,750
|
*
|
---
|
*
|
William
G. Benton
(10)
|
26,948
|
*
|
---
|
*
|
Thomas
E. Robinson
(11)
|
28,950
|
*
|
---
|
*
|
Allan
L. Schuman (12)
|
9,400
|
*
|
---
|
*
|
Frank
C. Marchisello, Jr.
(13)
|
64,792
|
*
|
5,000
|
*
|
Joe
Nehmen
(13)
|
6,427
|
*
|
12,000
|
*
|
Lisa
J. Morrison (13)
|
4,262
|
*
|
4,000
|
*
|
Directors
and Executive Officers as a Group
(13
persons) (14)
|
1,333,958
|
4.3%
|
6,188,810
|
20.1%
|
21
(1) |
The
ownership of Common Shares reported herein is based upon filings
with the
SEC and is subject to confirmation by us that such ownership did
not
violate the ownership restrictions in the Company’s Articles of
Incorporation.
|
(2) |
Represents
Common Shares that may be acquired upon the exchange of Units beneficially
owned for Common Shares. Each Unit held by the Tanger Family Limited
Partnership (the “TFLP”) and each Unit that may be acquired upon the
exercise of options to purchase Units may be exchanged for two of
our
Common Shares.
|
(3) |
Includes
278,062 Common Shares owned by the TFLP, of which Stanley K. Tanger
is the
general partner and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner, and
6,066,610 Common Shares which may be acquired upon the exchange of
Units
owned by TFLP. Also includes 570,554 Common Shares owned by Stanley
K.
Tanger individually and 20,000 Common Shares which may be acquired
upon
the exercise of presently exercisable options to purchase Units owned
by
Stanley K. Tanger individually and 2,000 Common Shares owned by Stanley
K.
Tanger’s spouse. Does not include 40,000 Common Shares which may be
acquired upon the exercise of options to purchase Units, which are
presently unexercisable, owned by Stanley K. Tanger
individually.
|
(4) |
Includes
56,000 Common Shares which may be acquired upon the exercise of presently
exercisable options to purchase Units. Does not include 278,062 Common
Shares owned by TFLP and 6,066,610 Common Shares which may be acquired
upon the exchange Units owned by the TFLP (Steven B. Tanger is a
limited
partner of the Tanger Investments Limited Partnership, which is a
limited
partner of TFLP) for Common Shares. Does not include 28,000 Common
Shares
which may be acquired upon the exercise of options to purchase Units
which
are presently unexercisable. Does not include 487,663 Common Shares
actually owned or 280,062 Common Shares which may be deemed beneficially
owned by Steven B. Tanger's father, Stanley K. Tanger. Includes 60,596
Common Shares which Mr. Steven B. Tanger has pledged as security
for
certain personal loans.
|
(5) |
We
have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC by FMR
Corp
(“FMR”) and Edward C. Johnson 3rd
reporting ownership of these shares as of December 31, 2006. As reported
in said Schedule 13G, FMR and Edward C. Johnson 3rd
has sole dispositive power for 3,481,400 of such shares and sole
voting
power for 532,300 of such shares.
|
(6) |
We
have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC by Deutsche
Bank AG (“DB”), RREEF America, L.L.C. (“RREEF”), Deutsche Asset
Management, Inc. (“DAMI”), Deutsche Bank Trust Corp. Americas (“DBTC”) and
Deutsche Investment Management Americas (“DIMA”) reporting ownership of
these shares as of December 31, 2006. As reported in said Schedule
13G,
(i) DB has sole dispositive power for 2,272,250 of such shares, shared
dispositive power of 10,000 of such shares and sole voting power
for
1,297,200 of such shares; (ii) RREEF has sole dispositive power for
2,207,400 of such shares and sole voting power for 1,264,050 of such
shares; (iii) DAMI has sole dispositive power for 51,250 of such
shares
and sole voting power for 33,150 of such shares and (iv) DBTC has
sole
dispositive power for 2,600 of such shares and shared dispositive
power
for 10,000 of such shares; and (v) DIMA has sole dispositive power
for
11,000 of such shares.
|
(7) |
We
have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC by The
Vanguard
Group, Inc. (“VG”) reporting ownership of these shares as of December 31,
2006. As reported in said Schedule 13G, VG has sole dispositive power
for
2,214,221 of such shares and sole voting power for 24,563 of such
shares.
|
(8) |
We
have received a copy of Schedule 13G as filed with the SEC by Cohen
&
Steers Inc. (“C&S”), Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.
(“C&SCM”) and Houlihan Rovers SA (“HR”) reporting ownership of these
shares as of December 31, 2006. As reported in said Schedule 13G,
(i)
C&S has shared dispositive and shared voting for 5,072 of such shares,
sole dispositive power for 2,198,214 of such shares and sole voting
power
for 1,995,314 of such shares; (ii) C&SCM has sole dispositive power
for 2,198,214 of such shares and sole voting power for 1,995,314
of such
shares and (iii) HR has sole dispositive power for 5,072 of such
shares
and sole voting power for 5,072 of such
shares.
|
22
(9) |
Includes
26,000 presently exercisable options to purchase our Common
Shares.
|
(10) |
Includes
8,400 presently exercisable options to purchase our Common
Shares.
|
(11) |
Includes
8,000 presently exercisable options to purchase our Common
Shares.
|
(12) |
Includes
2,400 presently exercisable options to purchase our Common Shares.
|
(13) |
Amounts
shown as Common Shares exchangeable for Units represent Common Shares
which may be acquired upon the exercise of presently exercisable
options
to purchase Units.
|
(14) |
Includes
167,000 Common Shares which may be acquired upon the exercise of
presently
exercisable options to purchase Common Shares or Units. Does not
include
139,600 Common Shares which may be acquired upon the exercise of
options
to purchase Common Shares or Units which are presently unexercisable.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
The
Company, through its majority owned subsidiaries, owns the majority of the
units
of partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership and controls the
Operating Partnership as its general partner. The Tanger Family Limited
Partnership (referred to as “TFLP”) holds a limited partnership interest in and
is the minority owner of the Operating Partnership. Stanley K. Tanger, the
Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is the sole general
partner of TFLP. During 2006, the Operating Partnership made quarterly
distributions to TFLP totaling $8.1 million. Such distributions were made
on the same pro rata basis as distributions made by the Operating
Partnership to the Company.
In
2004,
the Company adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of
Conduct”), which is posted on the Company’s website at www.tangeroutlet.com
and is
available by clicking on “OUR COMPANY”, then “FINANCIALS”, then “CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE’ and then “CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS” or by writing to our
Director of Administration at our principal executive offices. The Code of
Conduct states that conflicts of interest should be avoided wherever possible.
Conflicts of interest are broadly defined to include any situation where a
person’s private interest interferes in any way with the interests of the
Company. Any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be
expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should be discussed with the
applicable Code of Ethics Contact Person.
PROPOSAL
2
RATIFICATION
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Audit
Committee has appointed the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to audit the
accounts of the Company for the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2007 and
to
perform such other services as may be required. The submission of this matter
for approval by shareholders is not legally required; however, the Board of
Directors believes that such submission is consistent with best practices in
corporate governance and is an opportunity for shareholders to provide direct
feedback to the Board of Directors on an important issue of corporate
governance. If the shareholders do not approve the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the selection of such firm as our independent
registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered. Should the firm be
unable to perform these services for any reason, the Audit Committee will
appoint other independent registered public accountants to perform these
services.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP served as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal
year
ended December 31, 2006. There are no affiliations between the Company and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its partners, associates or employees, other than
its engagement as an independent registered public accounting firm for the
Company. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be
present at the meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they
desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from
shareholders. See the Report of the Audit Committee, included below, for
information relating to the fees billed to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
23
Vote
Required. Approval
of the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Company’s independent registered accounting firm requires approval by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of those votes cast at the
meeting; provided that a quorum is present. Accordingly, abstentions, broker
non-votes and Common Shares present at the meeting for any other purpose but
which are not voted on this proposal will not affect the outcome of the vote
on
the proposal.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING
FIRM
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The
Audit
Committee has provided the following report:
During
2006, we reviewed with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Director of
Internal Audit and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (referred to as “PwC”), the scope of the annual audit
and audit plans, the results of internal and external audit examinations, the
evaluation by the auditors of the Company’s system of internal control, the
quality of the Company’s financial reporting and the Company’s process for legal
and regulatory compliance. We also monitored the progress and results of the
testing of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Management
is responsible for the Company’s system of internal control, the financial
reporting process and the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. PwC is responsible for performing an integrated audit
and issuing reports and opinions on the following:
1. |
the
Company’s consolidated financial
statements;
|
2. |
the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
|
3. |
management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
|
As
provided in our Charter, our responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing
these processes.
Consistent
with this oversight responsibility, PwC reports directly to us. We appointed
PwC
as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and approved the
compensation of the firm. We reviewed and approved all non-audit services
performed by PwC during 2006 and determined that the provision of the services
was compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence.
PwC
provided to us the written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and we
discussed with PwC its independence.
We
reviewed and discussed the 2006 consolidated financial statements and
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting with management and PwC. We also discussed the
certification process with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Management represented to us that the Company’s consolidated financial
statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and that the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective. We discussed with PwC the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communication with Audit Committees).
Based
on
these discussions and reviews, we recommended to the Board of Directors that
the
audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
24
The
following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by the PwC for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
2006
|
2005
|
||
Audit
fees
|
$389,529
|
$475,480
|
|
Audit-related
fees
|
32,169
|
20,119
|
|
Tax
fees
|
490,439
|
358,637
|
|
All
other fees
|
---
|
---
|
|
Total
|
$912,137
|
$854,236
|
The
audit
fees for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were for
professional services rendered for the integrated audits of our consolidated
financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. Also
included are services related to the issuance of comfort letters, assistance
with the review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the audit of the previously consolidated real estate joint venture.
The
audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2006 were for consultation
and special audit work for a potential acquisition and for accounting standards
consultations. The audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2005
were
for consultation and special audit work for the acquisition of an interest
in a
previously consolidated real estate joint venture.
The
tax
fees for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were for tax compliance
and
tax research and planning services, including tax return preparation and tax
advice regarding acquisitions and joint ventures.
THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE
|
|
William
G. Benton (Chairman)
|
|
Jack
Africk
|
|
Allan
L. Schuman
|
PROPOSALS
TO AMEND THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO AUTHORIZE ADDITIONAL COMMON
SHARES AND ADDITIONAL CLASSES OF PREFERRED SHARES
The
Board
of Directors has recommended that the Company’s Articles of Incorporation be
amended to increase the number of Common Shares we are authorized to issue
from
50 million to 150 million and to create four new classes of preferred shares:
Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H each class having 4 million shares with
a
par value of $0.01 per share. The principal purpose of the proposed amendment
is
to increase the number of Common Shares and the classes and number of preferred
shares available for issue if the Board of Directors determines such issuance
to
be in our best interests for stock splits, acquisitions or to raise additional
equity to finance our growth. The Board of Directors has no present plan,
agreement, or arrangement to issue any additional shares which would be
authorized if the proposed amendment is approved by the shareholders. If the
proposed amendment authorizing issuance of additional classes of preferred
shares is approved by the shareholders, the Board of Directors does not intend
to solicit further shareholder approval prior to the issuance of any of the
Class E, Class F, Class G or Class H Preferred Shares, except as may be required
by applicable law.
The
recommendation of the Board is submitted to the shareholders in two proposals
to
permit shareholders to vote separately on Proposal #3 to increase in the number
of Common Shares only and on Proposal #4 to authorize the additional classes
of
preferred shares and to increase the number of Common Shares.
Version
One of Proposal #4 is for an amendment to the Articles that authorizes the
Board
of Directors to direct the issuance of the four new classes of preferred shares
which may rank equally with or junior to the Company’s presently outstanding
Class C Preferred Shares with respect to payment of dividends or the
distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The new
classes of preferred shares may not have rights or preferences with respect
to
distributions or to dissolution that are prior or superior to the Class C
Preferred Shares. This Version must be approved by the holders of Common Shares
and by the holders of Class C Preferred Shares voting as a separate group.
25
Version
Two of Proposal #4 is for an amendment to the Articles that authorizes the
Board
of Directors to direct the issuance of the new classes of preferred shares
which
will not alter or abolish a preferential right of the Class C Preferred Shares.
This Version must be approved only by the holders of Common Shares.
Holders
of Class C Preferred Shares are entitled to vote on Proposal #4 as a separate
group. If the holders of Common Shares approve Proposal #3 but do not approve
Proposal #4, Article II of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation will be
amended as set forth in Proposal #3 below. If Proposal #4 is approved by the
holders of Common Shares and is also approved by the holders of Class C
Preferred Shares voting as a separate group, Article II will be further amended
as set forth in Version One of Proposal #4. If Proposal #4 is approved by the
holders of Common Shares but is not approved by the holders of the Class C
Preferred Shares voting as a separate group, Article II will be further amended
as set forth in Version Two of Proposal #4.
PROPOSAL
3
AUTHORIZING
ADDITIONAL COMMON SHARES
RESOLVED
that the Company’s Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to authorize the
issuance of additional Common Shares by amending Paragraph A of Article II
as
provided below:
“A.
The
number of shares that the corporation is authorized to issue is 200 million
shares, divided into classes, as follows: 150 million Common Shares with a
par
value of $0.01 per share (the “Common Shares”); 25 million Excess Shares with a
par value of $0.01 per share (the “Excess Shares”); one million Preferred Shares
with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class A Preferred Shares”); eight
million Class B Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class
B Preferred Shares”); eight million Class C Preferred Shares with a par value of
$0.01 per share (the “Class C Preferred Shares”); and eight million Class D
Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class D Preferred
Shares”). The preferences, limitations and relative rights of each class of
shares are as forth in succeeding paragraphs of this Article II.”
Vote
Required. Approval
of the Proposal to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to increase the
number of Commons Shares authorized from 50 million to 150 million requires
the
affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Shares cast for or against the
Proposal at the meeting; provided that a quorum is present. Accordingly,
abstentions, broker non-votes and Common Shares present at the meeting for
any
other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will not affect the
outcome of the vote on the proposal.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
AUTHORIZED COMMON SHARES.
PROPOSAL
4
AUTHORIZING
ADDITIONAL COMMON SHARES AND
ADDITIONAL
CLASSES OF PREFERRED SHARES
RESOLVED
that the Company’s Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to authorize the
issuance of additional Common Shares and four new classes of preferred shares
by
amending Paragraphs A and D of Article II as provided below:
Version
One
“A.
The
number of shares that the corporation is authorized to issue is 216 million
shares, divided into classes, as follows: 150 million Common Shares with a
par
value of $0.01 per share (the “Common Shares”); 25 million Excess Shares with a
par value of $0.01 per share (the “Excess Shares”); one million Preferred Shares
with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class A Preferred Shares”); eight
million Class B Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class
B Preferred Shares”); eight million Class C Preferred Shares with a par value of
$0.01 per share (the “Class C Preferred Shares”); eight million Class D
Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class D Preferred
Shares”); four million Class E Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per
share (the “Class E Preferred Shares”); four million Class F Preferred Shares
with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class F Preferred Shares”); four
million Class G Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class
G Preferred Shares”); and four million Class H Preferred Shares with a par value
of $0.01 per share (the “Class H Preferred Shares”) The preferences, limitations
and relative rights of each class of shares are as forth in succeeding
paragraphs of this Article II.”
26
“D.
The
Class B Preferred Shares shall have the preferences, limitations and relative
rights set forth in Paragraph I of this Article II. Class C Preferred Shares
shall have the preferences, limitations and relative rights set forth in
Paragraph J of this Article II. Prior to the issuance the shares of any other
class of Preferred Shares, the Board of Directors of the corporation shall
determine, in whole or in part, the preferences, limitations and relative rights
of the shares in that class subject to the following limitations: (1) the shares
of any such other class of preferred shares may rank on a parity with or junior
to Class C Preferred Shares with respect to payment of dividends or the
distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up but may
not
have rights or preferences with respect to distributions or to dissolution
that
are prior or superior to the Class C Preferred Shares and (2) the preferences,
limitations and relative rights of such other class of preferred shares shall
not otherwise alter or abolish a preferential right of the Class B Preferred
Shares or of the Class C Preferred Shares.”
Version
Two
“A.
The
number of shares that the corporation is authorized to issue is 216 million
shares, divided into classes, as follows: 150 million Common Shares with a
par
value of $0.01 per share (the “Common Shares”); 25 million Excess Shares with a
par value of $0.01 per share (the “Excess Shares”); one million Preferred Shares
with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class A Preferred Shares”); eight
million Class B Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class
B Preferred Shares”); eight million Class C Preferred Shares with a par value of
$0.01 per share (the “Class C Preferred Shares”); eight million Class D
Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class D Preferred
Shares”); four million Class E Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per
share (the “Class E Preferred Shares”); four million Class F Preferred Shares
with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class F Preferred Shares”); four
million Class G Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class
G Preferred Shares”); and four million Class H Preferred Shares with a par value
of $0.01 per share (the “Class H Preferred Shares”) The preferences, limitations
and relative rights of each class of shares are as forth in succeeding
paragraphs of this Article II.”
“D.
The
Class B Preferred Shares shall have the preferences, limitations and relative
rights set forth in Paragraph I of this Article II. Class C Preferred Shares
shall have the preferences, limitations and relative rights set forth in
Paragraph J of this Article II. Prior to the issuance of shares of any other
class of Preferred Shares, the Board of Directors of the Company shall
determine, in whole or in part, the preferences, limitations and relative rights
of the shares in that class subject to the following limitation: The
preferences, limitations and relative rights of such other class of preferred
shares shall not alter or abolish a preferential right of the Class B Preferred
Shares or of the Class C Preferred Shares.”
Vote
Required. Approval
of the Proposal to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to create four
new classes of preferred shares and to increase the Company’s authorized Common
Shares requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Common Shares cast
for
or against the Proposal at the meeting (provided that a quorum of the Common
Shares is present). The holders of Class C Preferred Shares are entitled to
vote
on the Proposal as a separate group and approval of the Proposal by the Class
C
Preferred Shares requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Class C
Preferred Shares cast for or against the Proposal at the meeting (provided
a
quorum of the Class C Preferred Shares is present). Accordingly, abstentions,
broker non-votes and Common Shares and Class C Preferred Shares present at
the
meeting for any other purpose but which are not voted on this proposal will
not
affect the outcome of the vote on the proposal.
If
Proposal #4 is approved by the holders of Common Shares and is also approved
by
the holders of Class C Preferred Shares voting as a separate group, the Articles
will be amended as set forth in Version One of Proposal #4. If Proposal #4
is
approved by the holders of Common Shares but is not approved by the holders
of
the Class C Preferred Shares voting as a separate group, Article II will be
amended as set forth in Version Two of Proposal #4.
THE
BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO CREATE
FOUR NEW CLASSES OF PREFERRED SHARES AND TO INCREASE THE COMPANY’S AUTHORIZED
COMMON SHARES.
27
Other
Matters
Reference
is hereby made to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the Company’s Annual Report delivered together with this
Proxy Statement, and such documents incorporated herein by reference for
financial information and related disclosures required to be include
herein.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reports.
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our
officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of the ownership
and
changes in the ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC and the New York Stock
Exchange. Officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent
of
our Common Shares are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish us with
copies of all such forms which they file.
Based
solely on our review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and the amendments
thereto received by us for the period ended December 31, 2006, or written
representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that no Forms 3,
4 or
5 were filed delinquently, except that Ms. Lisa Morrison filed one small
transaction late that was required to be filed on Form 5 by February 14,
2007.
Shareholder
Proposals and Nominations.
This
Proxy Statement and form of proxy will be sent to shareholders in an initial
mailing on or about April ___, 2007. Proposals of shareholders pursuant to
Regulation 14a-8 of the Exchange Act intended to be presented at our Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2007 must be received by us no later
than
December ___, 2007. Such proposals must comply with the requirements as to
form
and substance established by the SEC for such proposals in order to be included
in the proxy statement. A shareholder who wishes to make a proposal pursuant
to
Regulation 14a-8 of the Exchange Act at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be
held in 2008 without including the proposal in the Company’s proxy statement and
form of proxy relating to that meeting must notify the Company in writing no
later than February 18, 2008. If a shareholder fails to give notice by February
18, 2008, then the persons named as proxies in the proxies solicited by the
Board for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008 may exercise
discretionary voting power with respect to any such proposal. Pursuant to the
Company's By-Laws, to be properly considered at our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held in 2008, all shareholder proposals, generally, must
be
received by our Corporate Secretary not earlier than 120 days and not later
than
90 days prior to the anniversary of this year's meeting.
Shareholders
may nominate an individual for election as a director of the Company in
conformity with the requirements of the Company’s By-Laws. Generally, to be
properly considered at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008,
written notice of the nomination must be delivered to the corporate secretary
not earlier than 120 days and not later than 90 days prior to the anniversary
of
this year’s meeting. Such shareholder's notice shall set forth as to each person
whom the shareholder nominates for election or reelection as a director all
information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in
solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest,
or is
otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities
Exchange Act (including such person's written consent to being named in the
proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected). In
addition, such shareholder notice must provide, as detailed in the Company’s
By-Laws, information about the shareholder’s beneficial ownership of our Common
Shares.
Board
Committee Charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics.
Each of
the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee operate under written charters adopted by the Board. The
Board has also adopted written Corporate Governance Guidelines in accordance
with listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and a written Code
of
Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to directors, management and employees
of the Company. We have made available copies of our Board Committee Charters,
Corporate Goverance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our
website at www.tangeroutlet.com. Copies of these documents may also be obtained
by sending a request in writing to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., 3200
Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, Attn: Corporate
Secretary.
28
Documents
Incorporated by Reference.
This
Proxy Statement incorporates documents by reference which are not presented
herein or delivered herewith. These documents (except for certain exhibits
to
such documents, unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated herein)
are
available upon request without charge. Requests may be oral or written and
should be directed to the attention of the Secretary of the Company at our
principal executive offices. In addition, our website is located at
http://www.tangeroutlet.com. On our website you can obtain, free of charge,
a
copy of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable
after we file such material electronically with, or furnish it to, the
SEC.
All
documents filed by the Company pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)
of
the Exchange Act subsequent to the date hereof and prior to the date of the
Meeting shall be deemed incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement
and
shall be deemed a part hereof from the date of filing of such documents. Any
statement contained in a document incorporated by reference herein shall be
deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Proxy Statement to
the
extent that a statement contained herein (or subsequently filed document which
is also incorporated by reference herein) modifies or supersedes such statement.
Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed to constitute a
part
of this Proxy Statement, except as so modified or superseded.
Other
Business.
All
Common Shares represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted in accordance
with the proxy. We know of no other business which will come before the meeting
for action. However, as to any such business, the persons designated as proxies
will have authority to act in their discretion.
29
TangerOutlets
[NAME
AND
ADDRESS APPEAR HERE] Electronic
Voting Instructions
You can vote by Internet or telephone!
Available
24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead
of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the
two
voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION
DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN
THE
TITLE
BAR.
Proxies
submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by
1:00
a.m., Central Time, on May 18, 2007.
Vote by Internet
· |
Log
on to the Internet and go to
|
www.investorvote.com
· |
Follow
the steps outlined on the secured
website.
|
Vote
by telephone
· |
Call
toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the United Sates, Canada &
Puerto Rico any time on a touch tone telephone. There is NO
CHARGE
to
you for the call.
|
· |
Follow
the instructions provided by the recorded message.
|
Using
a
black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this
example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. [X]
Annual
Meeting Proxy
Card
|
IF
YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION
IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A
Proposals - The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
all the nominees listed and FOR
Proposals 2 - 4.
1. |
Election
of Directors:
|
For
|
Withhold
|
For
|
Withhold
|
||||
01
- Stanley K. Tanger
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
4
-
William G. Benton
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
||
02
- Steven B. Tanger
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
5
-
Thomas E. Robinson
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
||
03
- Jack Africk
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
6
-
Allan L. Schuman
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
2. |
To
ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s
independent registered public accountant firm for the fiscal year
ending
December 31, 2007.
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
[ ]
|
3. |
To
consider a proposal by the directors to amend the Company’s articles of
incorporation to increase the number of common shares authorized
for
issuance from 50 million common shares to 150 million common shares.
The
proposed amendment is set forth in full in the enclosed Proxy Statement.
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
[ ]
|
4. |
To
consider a proposal by the directors to amend the Company’s articles of
incorporation to create four new classes of preferred shares, each
class
having four million shares with a par value of $.01 per share and
to
increase the number of common shares authorized for issuance from
50
million common shares to 150 million common shares. The proposed
amendment
is set forth in full in the enclosed Proxy Statement.
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
[ ]
|
5. |
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or
any adjournment(s) thereof.
|
B
Non-Voting Items
Change
of Address
- Please
print new address below.
|
IF
VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST
COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
[BACK
SIDE OF CARD]
IF
YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION
IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy
- Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
|
Appointment
of Proxy for Annual Meeting on May 18, 2007
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
undersigned shareholder of TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC., a North Carolina
corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Stanley K. Tanger and Frank
C.
Marchisello, Jr., and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution
to
act for the undersigned and to vote the shares which the undersigned may
be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of such corporation
on May 18, 2007, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, as instructed
on the reverse side upon the proposals which are more fully set forth in
the
Proxy Statement of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. dated April __, 2007
(receipt of which is acknowledged) and in their discretion upon any other
matters as may properly come before the meeting, including but not limited
to,
any proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting. Any appointment of proxy
heretofore made by the undersigned for such meeting is hereby
revoked.
The
shares represented hereby will be voted in accordance with the directions
given
in this appointment of proxy. If not otherwise directed herein, shares
represented by this proxy will be voted FOR Proposal 1-4.
PLEASE
SIGN, DATE AND MAIL PROMPTLY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE
ENCLOSED.
CONTINUED
ON REVERSE SIDE AND TO BE SIGNED BELOW.
C
Authorized
Signatures - This section must be completed for your vote to be counted.
- Date
and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer,
trustee, guardian, custodian, please give
full title.
Date
(mm/dd/yyyy) - Please print date below.
|
Signature
1- Please keep signature within box.
|
Signature
2 - Please keep signature within box .
|
|||||
|
IF
VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST
COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
[PROXY
CARD FOR PREFERRED SHARE HOLDERS]
TangerOutlets
[NAME
AND
ADDRESS APPEAR HERE]
Using
a
black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this
example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. [X]
Annual
Meeting Proxy Card
|
IF
YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION
IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A
Proposal - The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
Proposal 1.
1. |
To
consider a proposal by the directors to amend the Company’s articles of
incorporation to create four new classes of preferred shares, each
class
having four million shares with a par value of $.01 per share and
to
increase the number of common shares authorized for issuance from
50
million common shares to 150 million common shares. The proposed
amendment
is set forth in full in the enclosed Proxy Statement.
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
[
]
|
[
]
|
[ ]
|
B
Non-Voting Items
Change
of Address
- Please
print new address below.
|
IF
VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST
COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.
[BACK
SIDE OF CARD FOR PREFERRED SHARE HOLDERS]
IF
YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION
IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy
- Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.
|
Appointment
of Proxy for Annual Meeting on May 18, 2007
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
undersigned shareholder of TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC., a North Carolina
corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Stanley K. Tanger and Frank
C.
Marchisello, Jr., and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution
to
act for the undersigned and to vote the shares which the undersigned may
be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of such corporation
on May 18, 2007, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, as instructed
on the reverse side upon the proposals which are more fully set forth in
the
Proxy Statement of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. dated April __, 2007
(receipt of which is acknowledged) and in their discretion upon any other
matters as may properly come before the meeting, including but not limited
to,
any proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting. Any appointment of proxy
heretofore made by the undersigned for such meeting is hereby
revoked.
The
shares represented hereby will be voted in accordance with the directions
given
in this appointment of proxy. If not otherwise directed herein, shares
represented by this proxy will be voted FOR Proposal 1.
PLEASE
SIGN, DATE AND MAIL PROMPTLY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE
ENCLOSED.
CONTINUED
ON REVERSE SIDE AND TO BE SIGNED BELOW.
C
Authorized
Signatures - This section must be completed for your vote to be counted.
- Date
and Sign Below
Please
sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When
signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer,
trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full
title.
Date
(mm/dd/yyyy) - Please print date below.
|
Signature
1- Please keep signature within box.
|
Signature
2 - Please keep signature within box .
|
|||||
|
IF
VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST
COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.