10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on May 3, 2007
UNITED
STATES
|
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
FORM
10-Q
|
[
X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
|
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
|
OR
|
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) of
|
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from to
|
Commission
File No. 1-11986
|
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
|
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its
Charter)
|
NORTH
CAROLINA
|
56-1815473
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
3200
Northline Avenue, Suite 360, Greensboro, North Carolina
27408
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
(336)
292-3010
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes ý
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer ý
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Indicated
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨
No
ý
31,284,461
Common Shares,
|
$.01
par value, outstanding as of April 30,
2007
|
1
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
Index
Page
Number
|
||
Part
I. Financial Information
|
||
Item
1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets -
|
||
as
of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations -
|
||
for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows -
|
||
for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
|
||
Condition
and Results of Operations
|
14
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
26
|
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
27
|
|
Part
II. Other Information
|
||
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
26
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
28
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
28
|
|
Signatures
|
28
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||||
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Rental
property
|
|||||||||||||||||
Land
|
$
|
130,137
|
$
|
130,137
|
|||||||||||||
Buildings,
improvements and fixtures
|
1,071,691
|
1,068,070
|
|||||||||||||||
Construction
in progress
|
23,944
|
18,640
|
|||||||||||||||
1,225,772
|
1,216,847
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(287,720
|
)
|
(275,372
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Rental
property, net
|
938,052
|
941,475
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
3,273
|
8,453
|
||||||||||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
14,052
|
14,451
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Deferred
charges, net
|
52,312
|
55,089
|
||||||||||||||
|
Other
assets
|
21,149
|
21,409
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
1,028,838
|
$
|
1,040,877
|
||||||||||||
LIABILITIES,
MINORITY INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Debt
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Senior,
unsecured notes (net of discount of $815 and
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
$832,
respectively)
|
$
|
498,685
|
$
|
498,668
|
||||||||||||
|
Mortgages
payable (including a debt premium
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
of
$2,857 and $3,441, respectively)
|
|
178,363
|
179,911
|
|||||||||||||
677,048
|
678,579
|
||||||||||||||||
Construction
trade payables
|
22,266
|
23,504
|
|||||||||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
25,680
|
25,094
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
724,994
|
727,177
|
|||||||||||
Commitments
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Minority
interest in operating partnership
|
|
37,193
|
39,024
|
||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Preferred
shares, 7.5% Class C, liquidation preference
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
$25
per share, 8,000,000 shares authorized, 3,000,000
|
|
||||||||||||||
shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and
|
|||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
75,000
|
75,000
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Common
shares, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
authorized,
31,260,161 and 31,041,336 shares issued
|
|
||||||||||||||
and
outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
|
|||||||||||||||||
2006,
respectively
|
313
|
310
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Paid
in capital
|
|
347,933
|
346,361
|
|||||||||||||
|
Distributions
in excess of net income
|
|
(158,902
|
)
|
(150,223
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
2,307
|
3,228
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
266,651
|
274,676
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
Total
liabilities, minority interest and shareholders’
equity
|
$
|
1,028,838
|
$
|
1,040,877
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|||||||||
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||
|
Base
rentals
|
|
$
|
35,227
|
$
|
32,965
|
||||||
|
Percentage
rentals
|
|
1,468
|
1,158
|
||||||||
|
Expense
reimbursements
|
|
15,045
|
12,720
|
||||||||
|
Other
income
|
|
1,501
|
1,355
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
53,241
|
48,198
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Expenses
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Property
operating
|
|
17,005
|
14,765
|
||||||||
|
General
and administrative
|
|
4,277
|
4,081
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
18,487
|
15,950
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
39,769
|
34,796
|
||||||
Operating
income
|
|
13,472
|
13,402
|
|||||||||
|
Interest
expense
|
|
10,056
|
10,034
|
||||||||
Income
before equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ventures,
minority interest and discontinued operations
|
|
3,416
|
3,368
|
||||||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
235
|
147
|
||||||||||
Minority
interest in operating partnership
|
|
(370
|
)
|
(381
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
3,281
|
3,134
|
|||||||||
Discontinued
operations, net of minority interest
|
|
---
|
11,713
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
|
3,281
|
14,847
|
|||||||||
Preferred
share dividends
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
$
|
13,632
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share:
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.06
|
|||||||
|
Net
income
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.45
|
|||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share:
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.06
|
|||||||
|
Net
income
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.44
|
|||||||
Dividends
paid per common share
|
$
|
.3400
|
$
|
.3225
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
March 31
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Net
income
|
$
|
3,281
|
$
|
14,847
|
|||||||||||
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|
||||||||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization (including discontinued
|
|
|||||||||||||
operations)
|
18,487
|
16,066
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
|
418
|
298
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
(235
|
)
|
(147
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
|
Minority
interest in operating partnership
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
(including
discontinued operations)
|
|
370
|
2,709
|
||||||||||
|
|
Compensation
expense related to restricted shares
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
and
options granted
|
|
831
|
481
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Amortization
of debt premiums and discount, net
|
|
(630
|
)
|
(612
|
)
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of outparcels
|
---
|
(110
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Gain
on sale of real estate
|
|
---
|
(13,833
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
|
Distributions
received from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
525
|
525
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Net
accretion of market rent rate adjustment
|
|
(364
|
)
|
(458
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
|
Straight-line
base rent adjustment
|
|
(714
|
)
|
(464
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) due to changes in:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
2,922
|
(895
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
(2,207
|
)
|
|||||||||
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
22,670
|
16,200
|
|||||||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Additions
to rental property
|
|
(14,855
|
)
|
(14,619
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Additions
to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
---
|
(2,020
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Additions
to deferred lease costs
|
|
(647
|
)
|
(873
|
)
|
||||||||||
Net
proceeds from sale of real estate
|
---
|
7,236
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
(15,502
|
)
|
(10,276
|
)
|
||||||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Cash
dividends paid
|
|
(11,960
|
)
|
(10,962
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Distributions
to minority interest in operating partnership
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
(1,956
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Proceeds
from sale of preferred shares
|
|
---
|
19,499
|
||||||||||||
|
Net
proceeds from debt issuances
|
|
4,850
|
51,050
|
||||||||||||
|
Repayments
of debt
|
|
(5,814
|
)
|
(64,728
|
)
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from tax incentive financing
|
1,851
|
---
|
||||||||||||||
|
Additions
to deferred financing costs
|
|
---
|
(77
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
Proceeds
from exercise of options
|
|
788
|
473
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
(12,348
|
)
|
(6,701
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(5,180
|
)
|
(777
|
)
|
||||||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
8,453
|
2,930
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
3,273
|
$
|
2,153
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
5
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
Business
|
Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries is one of the largest owners
and
operators of factory outlet centers in the United States. We are a
fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment
trust, or REIT, that focuses exclusively on developing, acquiring, owning,
operating and managing factory outlet shopping centers. As of March 31, 2007,
we
owned 30 outlet centers with a total gross leasable area, or GLA, of
approximately 8.4 million square feet. These factory outlet centers were 95%
occupied. We also owned a 50% interest in each of two outlet centers with a
GLA
of approximately 667,000 square feet and managed for a fee two outlet centers
with a GLA of approximately 229,000 square feet.
Our
factory outlet centers and other assets are held by, and all of our operations
are conducted by, Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries.
Accordingly, the descriptions of our business, employees and properties are
also
descriptions of the business, employees and properties of the Operating
Partnership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers
to Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term “Operating
Partnership” refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries.
The terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the
Operating Partnership together, as the text requires.
We
own
the majority of the units of partnership interest issued by the Operating
Partnership through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Tanger GP Trust
and
the Tanger LP Trust. The Tanger GP Trust controls the Operating Partnership
as
its sole general partner. The Tanger LP Trust holds a limited partnership
interest. The Tanger family, through its ownership of the Tanger Family Limited
Partnership, or TFLP, holds the remaining units as a limited partner. Stanley
K.
Tanger, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is the sole
general partner of TFLP.
2. |
Basis
of Presentation
|
Our
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31,
2006. The December 31, 2006 balance sheet data was derived from audited
financial statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ("SEC") rules and
regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate
to
make the information presented not misleading.
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include our accounts,
our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as the Operating Partnership and its
subsidiaries and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the interim consolidated financial
statements. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Investments
in real estate joint ventures that represent non-controlling ownership interests
are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These investments
are
recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our equity in the
venture's net income (loss) and cash contributions and
distributions.
6
3. |
Development
of Rental Properties
|
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, we closed on the acquisition of the Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania site land for $4.8 million. Tax incentive financing bonds have
been
issued, with net proceeds of approximately $16.8 million expected to be received
by us as qualifying expenditures during construction of the center are incurred.
As of March 31, 2007, we have received approximately $2.4 million for qualifying
expenditures. We currently expect to open the first phase of the center,
approximately 308,000 square feet, during the second quarter of 2008.
Expansions
at Existing Centers
During
2007, we plan to expand four centers by a combined 140,000 square feet. These
centers are located in Barstow, California; Branson, Missouri; Gonzales,
Louisiana and Tilton, New Hampshire. These expansions are projected to be open
during the first quarter of 2008.
Commitments
to complete construction of the new development and other capital expenditure
requirements amounted to approximately $24.4 million at March 31, 2007.
Commitments for construction represent only those costs contractually required
to be paid by us.
Interest
costs capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 amounted
to $254,000 and $475,000, respectively.
Change
in Accounting Estimate
During
the first quarter of 2007, our Board of Directors formally approved a plan
to
reconfigure our center in Foley, Alabama. As a part of this plan, approximately
40,000 square feet of GLA will be relocated within the property. The depreciable
useful lives of the buildings to be demolished have been shortened to coincide
with their demolition dates throughout the first three quarters of 2007 and
thus
the change in estimated useful life has been accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate. Approximately 16,750 square feet of GLA was demolished
as
of March 31, 2007 with the remainder to be demolished during the second and
third quarters. Accelerated depreciation recognized related to the
reconfiguration reduced income from continuing operations and net income by
approximately $3.4 million, net of minority interest of approximately $700,000,
and income from continuing operations per share and net income per share by
$.11
per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The amount of
buildings, fixtures and improvements related to the demolition which was fully
depreciated and written off during the three months ended March 31, 2007 totaled
$2.7 million.
7
4. |
Investments
in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint
Ventures
|
Our
investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures as of March 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006 aggregated $14.1 million and $14.5 million, respectively.
We have evaluated the accounting treatment for each of the joint ventures under
the guidance of FIN 46R and have concluded based on the current facts and
circumstances that the equity method of accounting should be used to account
for
the individual joint ventures. We are members of the following unconsolidated
real estate joint ventures:
Joint
Venture
|
Our
Ownership %
|
Project
Location
|
TWMB
Associates, LLC
|
50%
|
Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina
|
Tanger
Wisconsin Dells, LLC
|
50%
|
Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin
|
Deer
Park Enterprise, LLC
|
33%
|
Deer
Park, New York
|
These
investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for our
equity in the venture’s net income (loss) and cash contributions and
distributions. Our investments in real estate joint ventures are reduced by
50%
of the profits earned for leasing and development services we provided to TWMB
Associates, LLC, or TWMB, and Tanger Wisconsin Dells, LLC, or Tanger Wisconsin
Dells. The following management, leasing, marketing and development fees were
recognized from services provided to TWMB and Tanger Wisconsin Dells during
the
quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Three months
|
||||
Ended March 31,
|
||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||
Fee:
|
||||
Management
|
$
120
|
$
78
|
||
Leasing
|
25
|
3
|
||
Marketing
|
29
|
18
|
||
Development
|
---
|
97
|
||
Total
Fees
|
$
174
|
$
196
|
Our
carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures differs from
our
share of the assets reported in the “Summary Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures” shown below due to adjustments to the book basis, including
intercompany profits on sales of services that are capitalized by the
unconsolidated joint ventures. The differences in basis are amortized over
the
various useful lives of the related assets.
Tanger
Wisconsin Dells, LLC
In
March
2005, we established the Tanger Wisconsin Dells joint venture to construct
and
operate a Tanger Outlet center in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin. The 264,900 square
foot center opened in August 2006. In February 2006, in conjunction with the
construction of the center, Tanger Wisconsin Dells closed on a construction
loan
in the amount of $30.25 million with Wells Fargo Bank, NA due in February 2009.
The construction loan is repayable on an interest only basis with interest
floating based on the 30, 60 or 90 day LIBOR index plus 1.30%. The construction
loan incurred by this unconsolidated joint venture is collateralized by its
property as well as joint and several guarantees by us and designated guarantors
of our venture partner. The construction loan balance as of March 31, 2007
was
approximately $28.9 million.
8
Deer
Park Enterprise, LLC
In
October 2003, we established the Deer Park Enterprise, LLC joint venture, or
Deer Park, to develop a shopping center in Deer Park, New York. As of March
31,
2007, Deer Park had completed the demolition of existing buildings and parking
lots located at the site. Site work has begun on the initial phase that will
contain approximately 688,000 square feet of GLA including a sixteen screen
cinema, a 32,000 square foot fitness center and a mix of luxury and upscale
outlet stores.
In
September 2006, Deer Park closed on an initial construction loan of up
to $43.2 million with Bank of America which was subsequently increased to
$50.0 million and incurs interest at a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR
plus 2.00% and is collateralized by the property as well as joint and several
guarantees by all three venture partners. The construction loan balance as
of
March 31, 2007 was approximately $38.8 million. The loan was originally
schedule to mature in April 2007 but has been extended to June 4, 2007. By
that
date, Deer Park intends to have financing for the construction of the balance
of
the project in-place with a construction loan of approximately $280.0 million.
Condensed
combined summary unaudited financial information of joint ventures accounted
for
using the equity method is as follows (in thousands):
Summary
Balance Sheets
-
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
As
of
March
31,
2007
|
As
of
December
31,
2006
|
||
Assets:
|
||||
Investment
properties at cost, net
|
$
74,017
|
$
74,253
|
||
Construction
in progress
|
44,049
|
38,449
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
3,260
|
6,539
|
||
Deferred
charges, net
|
2,294
|
2,824
|
||
Other
assets
|
16,663
|
15,239
|
||
Total
assets
|
$140,283
|
$
137,304
|
||
Liabilities
and Owners’ Equity:
|
||||
Mortgages
payable
|
$
103,444
|
$
100,138
|
||
Construction
trade payables
|
1,283
|
2,734
|
||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
4,696
|
2,767
|
||
Total
liabilities
|
109,423
|
105,639
|
||
Owners’
equity
|
30,860
|
31,665
|
||
Total
liabilities and owners’ equity
|
$140,283
|
$
137,304
|
Summary
Statement of Operations
|
For the three months ended
|
|||
-
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
March
31, 2007
|
March
31, 2006
|
||
Revenues
|
$
4,636
|
$
2,657
|
||
Expenses:
|
||||
Property
operating
|
1,764
|
1,030
|
||
General
and administrative
|
42
|
7
|
||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,357
|
786
|
||
Total
expenses
|
3,163
|
1,823
|
||
Operating
income
|
1.473
|
834
|
||
Interest
expense
|
1,056
|
569
|
||
Net
income
|
$
417
|
$
265
|
||
Tanger
Factory Outlet Centers, Inc’s share of:
|
||||
Net
income
|
$ 235
|
$ 147
|
||
Depreciation
(real estate related)
|
$
654
|
$ 379
|
||
9
5. Disposition
of Properties
2006
Transactions
In
January 2006, we completed the sale of our property located in Pigeon Forge,
Tennessee. Net proceeds received from the sale of the center were approximately
$6.0 million. We recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately $3.6
million.
In
March
2006, we completed the sale of our property located in North Branch, Minnesota.
Net proceeds received on April 3, 2006 were approximately $14.2 million. A
receivable was recorded for the net proceeds from the sale in other assets
as of
March 31, 2006. We recorded a gain on sale of real estate of approximately
$10.3
million.
We
continue to manage and lease these properties for a fee. Based on the nature
and
amounts of the fees to be received, we have determined that our management
relationship does not constitute a significant continuing involvement and
therefore we have shown the results of operations and gain on sale of real
estate as discontinued operations under the provisions of FAS 144. Below is
a
summary of the results of operations for the Pigeon Forge, Tennessee and North
Branch, Minnesota properties sold during the first quarter of 2006 (in
thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
||||||||
Summary
Statements of Operations - Disposed
|
|
March 31,
|
|
||||||||
Properties
Included in Discontinued Operations
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||
Base
rentals
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
448
|
|||||||
Percentage
rentals
|
---
|
6
|
|||||||||
Expense
reimbursements
|
---
|
219
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
---
|
14
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
---
|
687
|
|||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||
Property
operating
|
---
|
360
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
---
|
3
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
---
|
116
|
|||||||||
Total
expenses
|
---
|
479
|
|||||||||
Discontinued
operations before gain on sale of real estate
|
---
|
208
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of real estate included in
|
|||||||||||
discontinued
operations
|
---
|
13,833
|
|||||||||
Discontinued
operations before minority interest
|
---
|
14,041
|
|||||||||
Minority
interest
|
---
|
(2,328
|
)
|
||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
$
|
---
|
$
|
11,713
|
2006
Outparcel Sales
Gains
on
sale of outparcels are included in other income in the consolidated statements
of operations. Cost is allocated to the outparcels based on the relative market
value method. Below is a summary of outparcel sales that we completed during
the
three months ended March 31, 2006. No outparcels were sold in the 2007 period.
(in thousands, except number of outparcels):
2006
|
|
Number
of outparcels
|
2
|
Net
proceeds
|
$626
|
Gains
on sales included in other income
|
$110
|
10
6. |
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
Total
comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is
as
follows (in thousands):
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,281
|
$
|
14,847
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for amortization of gain on
|
|||||||
settlement
of US treasury rate lock included in net income,
|
|||||||
net
of minority interest of $(11) and $(10)
|
(53
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
|||
Change
in fair value of treasury rate locks,
|
|||||||
net
of minority interest of $(157) and $879
|
(798
|
)
|
4,424
|
||||
Change
in fair value of our portion of TWMB cash
|
|||||||
flow
hedge, net of minority interest of $(14) and $43
|
(70
|
)
|
215
|
||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
(921
|
)
|
4,589
|
||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,360
|
$
|
19,436
|
7. Share-Based
Compensation
During
the first quarter of 2007, the Board of Directors approved the grant of 170,000
restricted common shares to the independent directors and our officers. The
independent directors’ restricted common shares vest ratably over a three year
period. The officer restricted common shares vest ratably over a five year
period. The grant date fair value of the awards, or $42.31 per share, was
determined based upon the closing market price of our common shares on the
day
prior to the grant date in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Incentive
Award Plan. Compensation expense related to the amortization of the deferred
compensation amount is being recognized in accordance with the vesting schedule
of the restricted shares. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007
and 2006, we recognized approximately $831,000 and $481,000, respectively,
in
share-based payment compensation.
11
8. |
Earnings
Per Share
|
The
following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators
in computing earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (in thousands, except per
share
amounts):
Three
months ended March 31
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
NUMERATOR:
|
||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
3,281
|
$
|
3,134
|
||||||
Less
applicable preferred share dividends
|
(1,406
|
)
|
(1,215
|
)
|
||||||
Income
from continuing operations available
|
||||||||||
to
common shareholders
|
1,875
|
1,919
|
||||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
---
|
11,713
|
||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
1,875
|
$
|
13,632
|
||||||
DENOMINATOR:
|
||||||||||
Basic
weighted average common shares
|
30,743
|
30,531
|
||||||||
Effect
of exchangeable notes
|
421
|
----
|
||||||||
Effect
of outstanding options
|
248
|
246
|
||||||||
Effect
of unvested restricted share awards
|
137
|
84
|
||||||||
Diluted
weighted average common shares
|
31,549
|
30,861
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.06
|
||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
---
|
.39
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.45
|
||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share:
|
||||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.06
|
||||||
Discontinued
operations
|
---
|
.38
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
.06
|
$
|
.44
|
The
exchangeable notes are included in the diluted earnings per share computation
if
the effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method. In applying the
treasury stock method, the effect will be dilutive if the average market price
of our common shares for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading
days at the end of each quarter is higher than the initial exchange rate of
$36.1198 per share.
The
computation of diluted earnings per share excludes options to purchase common
shares when the exercise price is greater than the average market price of
the
common shares for the period. No options were excluded from the computations
for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The assumed
conversion of the partnership units held by the minority interest limited
partner as of the beginning of the year, which would result in the elimination
of earnings allocated to the minority interest in the Operating Partnership,
would have no impact on earnings per share since the allocation of earnings
to a
partnership unit, as if converted, is equivalent to earnings allocated to a
common share.
Restricted
share awards are included in the diluted earnings per share computation if
the
effect is dilutive, using the treasury stock method. A total of 76,000
restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2007. All
restricted shares issued were included in the computation of diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2006. If the share based
awards were granted during the period, the shares issuable are weighted to
reflect the portion of the period during which the awards were
outstanding.
12
9. |
Derivatives
|
In
accordance with our derivatives policy, all derivatives are assessed for
effectiveness at the time the contracts are entered into and are assessed for
effectiveness on an on-going basis at each quarter end. All of our derivatives
have been designated as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains and losses related
to
the effective portion of our derivatives are recognized in other comprehensive
income and gains or losses related to ineffective portions are recognized in
the
income statement. At March 31, 2007, all of our derivatives were considered
effective.
The
following table summarizes the notional values and fair values of our derivative
financial instruments as of March 31, 2007.
Financial
Instrument Type
|
Notional
Value
|
Rate
|
Maturity
|
Fair
Value
|
||
TANGER
PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
||||||
US
Treasury Lock
|
$100,000,000
|
4.526%
|
July
2008
|
$
|
516,000
|
|
US
Treasury Lock
|
$100,000,000
|
4.715%
|
July
2008
|
$
|
(729,000
|
)
|
TWMB,
ASSOCIATES, LLC
|
||||||
LIBOR
Interest Rate Swap (1)
|
$35,000,000
|
4.59%
|
March
2010
|
$
|
244,000
|
(1)
Amount
represents fair value at TWMB Associates, LLC, in which we have a 50% ownership
interest.
10.
Non-Cash Investing Activities
We
purchase capital equipment and incur costs relating to construction of
facilities, including tenant finishing allowances. Expenditures included in
construction trade payables as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $22.3
million and $14.2 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31,
2006, other assets includes a receivable from the sale of the North Branch,
Minnesota center. The transaction closed on March 31, 2006 and the net proceeds
of approximately $14.2 million were received on April 3, 2006.
11. New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes--an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, or FIN 48, which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN
48
requires that we recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial
statements only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained
on
audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN
48
are effective as of January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change
in
accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.
As
a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized no adjustment in
retained earnings for unrecognized income tax benefits. We had no provision
for
uncertain income tax benefits prior to adoption of FIN 48, and this remained
unchanged. The tax years 2003 - 2006 remain open to examination by the major
tax
jurisdictions to which we are subject.
13
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
The
discussion of our results of operations reported in the unaudited, consolidated
statements of operations compares the three months ended March 31, 2007 with
the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The following discussion should be read
in
conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set
forth in the unaudited, consolidated statements of operations, including trends
which might appear, are not necessarily indicative of future operations. Unless
the context indicates otherwise, the term “Company” refers to Tanger Factory
Outlet Centers, Inc. and subsidiaries and the term “Operating Partnership”
refers to Tanger Properties Limited Partnership and subsidiaries. The terms
“we”, “our” and “us” refer to the Company or the Company and the Operating
Partnership together, as the text requires.
Cautionary
Statements
Certain
statements made below are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend for such forward-looking
statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and included
this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe
our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by
use
of the words “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”,
or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since
they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
are,
in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect our actual
results, performance or achievements. Factors which may cause actual results
to
differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to,
those set forth under Item 1A - “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. There have been no material changes to
the
risk factors listed there through March 31, 2007.
General
Overview
At
March
31, 2007, our consolidated portfolio included 30 wholly owned outlet centers
in
21 states totaling 8.4 million square feet of gross leaseable area, or GLA,
compared to 29 wholly owned outlet centers in 21 states totaling 8.0 million
square feet of GLA at March 31, 2006. The changes in the number of centers
and
GLA are due to the following events:
|
No.
of
Centers
|
GLA
(000’s)
|
|
States
|
||||||
As
of March 31, 2006
|
29
|
8,030
|
21
|
|||||||
New
development:
|
||||||||||
Charleston,
South Carolina
|
1
|
352
|
---
|
|||||||
Demolition:
|
||||||||||
Foley,
Alabama
|
---
|
(17
|
)
|
---
|
||||||
Other
|
---
|
7
|
---
|
|||||||
As
of March 31, 2007
|
30
|
8,372
|
21
|
14
The
table
set forth below summarizes certain information with respect to our existing
outlet centers in which we have an ownership interest or manage as of March
31,
2007.
Location
|
GLA
|
%
|
||
Wholly
Owned Properties
|
(sq.
ft.)
|
Occupied
|
||
Riverhead,
New York (1)
|
729,315
|
97
|
||
Rehoboth
Beach, Delaware (1)
|
568,926
|
98
|
||
Foley,
Alabama
|
540,343
|
96
|
||
San
Marcos, Texas
|
442,510
|
98
|
||
Myrtle
Beach Hwy 501, South Carolina
|
426,417
|
94
|
||
Sevierville,
Tennessee (1)
|
419,038
|
98
|
||
Hilton
Head, South Carolina
|
393,094
|
85
|
||
Charleston,
South Carolina
|
352,260
|
90
|
||
Commerce
II, Georgia
|
347,025
|
94
|
||
Howell,
Michigan
|
324,631
|
99
|
||
Park
City, Utah
|
300,602
|
99
|
||
Locust
Grove, Georgia
|
293,868
|
94
|
||
Westbrook,
Connecticut
|
291,051
|
93
|
||
Branson,
Missouri
|
277,883
|
98
|
||
Williamsburg,
Iowa
|
277,230
|
95
|
||
Lincoln
City, Oregon
|
270,280
|
99
|
||
Tuscola,
Illinois
|
256,514
|
69
|
||
Lancaster,
Pennsylvania
|
255,152
|
99
|
||
Gonzales,
Louisiana
|
243,499
|
98
|
||
Tilton,
New Hampshire
|
227,849
|
96
|
||
Fort
Meyers, Florida
|
198,950
|
97
|
||
Commerce
I, Georgia
|
185,750
|
90
|
||
Terrell,
Texas
|
177,490
|
98
|
||
West
Branch, Michigan
|
112,120
|
87
|
||
Barstow,
California
|
109,600
|
100
|
||
Blowing
Rock, North Carolina
|
104,280
|
97
|
||
Nags
Head, North Carolina
|
82,178
|
100
|
||
Boaz,
Alabama
|
79,575
|
92
|
||
Kittery
I, Maine
|
59,694
|
100
|
||
Kittery
II, Maine
|
24,619
|
94
|
||
Totals
|
8,371,743
|
95
(2)
|
||
Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures
|
|||
Myrtle
Beach Hwy 17, South Carolina (1)
|
401,992
|
||
Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin
|
264,929
|
Managed
Properties
|
|||
North
Branch, Minnesota
|
134,480
|
||
Pigeon
Forge, Tennessee
|
94,694
|
(1) |
These
properties or a portion thereof are subject to a ground
lease.
|
(2) |
Excludes
the occupancy rate at our Charleston, South Carolina center which
opened
during the third quarter of 2006 and has not yet
stabilized.
|
15
The
table
set forth below summarizes certain information as of March 31, 2007 related
to
GLA and debt with respect to our wholly owned existing outlet centers which
serve as collateral for existing mortgage loans.
Location
|
GLA
(sq.
ft.)
|
Mortgage Debt
(000’s) as of
March 31,
2007
|
Interest
Rate
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Capmark
|
|||||
Rehoboth
Beach, Delaware
|
568,926
|
||||
Foley,
Alabama
|
540,343
|
||||
Myrtle
Beach Hwy 501,
South
Carolina
|
426,417
|
||||
Hilton
Head, South Carolina
|
393,094
|
||||
Park
City, Utah
|
300,602
|
||||
Westbrook,
Connecticut
|
291,051
|
||||
Lincoln
City, Oregon
|
270,280
|
||||
Tuscola,
Illinois
|
256,514
|
||||
Tilton,
New Hampshire
|
227,849
|
||||
$175,506
|
6.590%
|
7/10/2008
|
|||
Net
debt premium
|
2,857
|
||||
Totals
|
3,275,076
|
$178,363
|
|||
16
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of the three months ended March 31, 2007 to the three months ended March 31,
2006
Base
rentals increased $2.3 million, or 7%, in the 2007 period compared to the 2006
period. Our overall occupancy rates were comparable from period to period at
95%. Approximately $1.5 million of the increase was due to the August 2006
opening of our new center in Charleston, South Carolina. Our base rental income
increased $0.8 million due to increases in rental rates on lease renewals and
incremental rents from re-tenanting vacant space. During the 2007 period, we
executed 245 leases totaling 1.1 million square feet at an average increase
of
20.6%. This compares to our execution of 280 leases totaling 1.2 million square
feet at an average increase of 13.5% during the 2006 period.
The
values of the above and below market leases, recorded when operating properties
are acquired, are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case
of
below market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above market leases) to
rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease. For the 2007
period, we recorded $364,000 of additional rental income for the net
amortization of acquired lease values compared with $458,000 of additional
rental income for the 2006 period. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the
contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made
on
the lease, any unamortized balance of the related above or below market lease
value will be written off and could materially impact our net income positively
or negatively.
Percentage
rentals, which represent revenues based on a percentage of tenants' sales volume
above predetermined levels (the "breakpoint"), increased $310,000 or 27%.
Reported same-space sales per square foot for the rolling twelve months ended
March 31, 2007 were $344 per square foot. This represents a 5% increase compared
to the same period in 2006. Same-space sales is defined as the weighted average
sales per square foot reported in space open for the full duration of each
comparison period.
Expense
reimbursements, which represent the contractual recovery from tenants of certain
common area maintenance, insurance, property tax, promotional, advertising
and
management expenses generally fluctuates consistently with the reimbursable
property operating expenses to which it relates. Expense reimbursements,
expressed as a percentage of property operating expenses, were 88% and 86%
in
the 2007 and 2006 periods, respectively.
Property
operating expenses increased $2.2 million, or 15%, in the 2007 period as
compared to the 2006 period. The increase is due primarily to the incremental
operating costs at our Charleston, South Carolina outlet center in the 2007
period. In addition in the first quarter of 2007, we incurred higher snow
removal costs at our northeastern properties and we have experienced a
significant increase in property insurance costs as a result of higher policy
rates at the time of our last renewal during August 2006.
17
General
and administrative expenses increased $196,000, or 5%, in the 2007 period as
compared to the 2006 period. The increase is primarily due to a full quarter
effect of the restricted shares issued in late February 2006 and additional
restricted shares issued in late February 2007. As a percentage of total
revenues, general and administrative expenses were 8% in both the 2007 and
2006
periods, respectively.
Depreciation
and amortization increased $2.5 million, or 16%, in the 2007 period compared
to
the 2006 period. During the first quarter of 2007, our Board of Directors
formally approved a plan to reconfigure our center in Foley, Alabama. As a
part
of this plan, approximately 40,000 square feet of GLA will be relocated within
the property. The depreciable useful lives of the buildings to be demolished
have been shortened to coincide with their demolition dates throughout the
first
three quarters of 2007 and thus the change in estimated useful life has been
accounted for as a change in accounting estimate. Approximately 16,750 square
feet of GLA was demolished as of March 31, 2007 with the remainder to be
demolished during the second and third quarters. Accelerated depreciation
recognized related to the reconfiguration reduced income from continuing
operations and net income by approximately $3.4 million, net of minority
interest of approximately $700,000, and income from continuing operations per
share and net income per share by $.11 per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The amount of buildings, fixtures and improvements related
to the demolition which was fully depreciated and written off during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 totaled $2.7 million.
Discontinued
operations includes the results of operations and gains on sales of real estate
for our Pigeon Forge, Tennessee and North Branch, Minnesota centers. No sales
of
real estate occurred in the 2007 period. The following table summarizes the
results of operations and gains on sale of real estate for the 2006
period:
Summary
of discontinued operations
|
||||
Operating
income from discontinued operations
|
$
|
208
|
||
Gain
on sale of real estate
|
13,833
|
|||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
14,041
|
|||
Minority
interest in discontinued operations
|
(2,328
|
)
|
||
Discontinued
operations, net of minority interest
|
$
|
11,713
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $22.7 million and $16.2 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in net
cash provided by operating activities is due primarily to higher operating
cash
flow from the addition of the Charleston, South Carolina center in August 2006
and higher renewal and re-tenant rates throughout our portfolio. Net cash used
in investing activities was $15.5 million and $10.3 million during the first
three months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Proceeds received from the sale
of
our Pigeon Forge, Tennessee outlet center offset by additional investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures caused net cash used in investing activities
in
the 2006 period to be lower than the 2007 period . Net cash used in financing
activities was $12.3 million and $6.7 million during the first three months
of
2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used in financing was lower in 2006 due
to
the net proceeds of $19.5 million from the sale of 800,000 preferred shares,
a
significant portion of which was used to repay amounts outstanding on our
unsecured lines of credit.
Current
Developments and Dispositions
Any
developments or expansions that we, or a joint venture that we are involved
in,
have planned or anticipated may not be started or completed as scheduled, or
may
not result in accretive net income or funds from operations. In addition, we
regularly evaluate acquisition or disposition proposals and engage from time
to
time in negotiations for acquisitions or dispositions of properties. We may
also
enter into letters of intent for the purchase or sale of properties. Any
prospective acquisition or disposition that is being evaluated or which is
subject to a letter of intent may not be consummated, or if consummated, may
not
result in an increase in net income or funds from operations.
18
WHOLLY
OWNED CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, we closed on the acquisition of the Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania site land for $4.8 million. Tax incentive financing bonds have
been
issued, with net proceeds of approximately $16.8 million expected to be received
by us as qualifying expenditures during construction of the center are incurred.
As of March 31, 2007, we have received approximately $2.4 million for qualifying
expenditures. We currently expect to open the first phase of the center,
approximately 308,000 square feet, during the second quarter of 2008.
Mebane,
North Carolina
We
currently have an option for a new development site located in Mebane, North
Carolina on the highly traveled Interstate 40/85 corridor, which sees over
83,000 cars daily. The site is located halfway between the Research Triangle
Park area of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, and the Triad area of Greensboro,
High Point and Winston-Salem. During the option period we will be analyzing
the
viability of the site and determine whether to proceed with the development
of a
center at this location.
Expansions
at Existing Centers
During
2007, we plan to expand four centers by a combined 140,000 square feet. These
centers are located in Barstow, California; Branson, Missouri; Gonzales,
Louisiana and Tilton, New Hampshire. These expansions are projected to be open
during the first quarter of 2008.
Commitments
to complete construction of the new development and other capital expenditure
requirements amounted to approximately $24.4 million at March 31, 2007.
Commitments for construction represent only those costs contractually required
to be paid by us.
UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT VENTURES
We
are
members of the following unconsolidated real estate joint ventures:
Joint
Venture
|
Our
Ownership %
|
Project
Location
|
TWMB
Associates, LLC
|
50%
|
Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina
|
Tanger
Wisconsin Dells, LLC
|
50%
|
Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin
|
Deer
Park Enterprise, LLC
|
33%
|
Deer
Park, New York
|
Tanger
Wisconsin Dells, LLC
In
March
2005, we established the Tanger Wisconsin Dells, LLC, or Tanger Wisconsin Dells,
joint venture to construct and operate a Tanger Outlet center in Wisconsin
Dells, Wisconsin. The 264,900 square foot center opened in August 2006. In
February 2006, in conjunction with the construction of the center, Tanger
Wisconsin Dells closed on a construction loan in the amount of $30.25 million
with Wells Fargo Bank, NA due in February 2009. The construction loan is
repayable on an interest only basis with interest floating based on the 30,
60
or 90 day LIBOR index plus 1.30%. The construction loan incurred by this
unconsolidated joint venture is collateralized by its property as well as joint
and several guarantees by us and designated guarantors of our venture partner.
The construction loan balance as of March 31, 2007 was approximately $28.9
million.
19
Deer
Park Enterprise, LLC
In
October 2003, we established the Deer Park Enterprise, LLC joint venture, or
Deer Park, to develop a shopping center in Deer Park, New York. As of March
31,
2007, Deer Park had completed the demolition of existing buildings and parking
lots located at the site. Site work has begun on the initial phase that will
contain approximately 688,000 square feet of GLA including a sixteen screen
cinema, a 32,000 square foot fitness center and a mix of luxury and upscale
outlet stores.
In
September 2006, Deer Park closed on an initial construction loan of up to $43.2
million with Bank of America which was subsequently increased to $50.0 million
and incurs interest at a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.00% and
is
collateralized by the property as well as joint and several guarantees by all
three venture partners. The construction loan balance as of March 31, 2007
was
approximately $38.8 million. The loan was originally schedule to mature in
April 2007 but has been extended to June 4, 2007. By that date, Deer Park
intends to have financing for the construction of the balance of the project
in-place with a construction loan of approximately $280.0 million.
Financing
Arrangements
At
March
31, 2007, approximately 74% of our outstanding long-term debt represented
unsecured borrowings and approximately 57% of the gross book value of our real
estate portfolio was unencumbered. The average interest rate, including loan
cost amortization, on average debt outstanding for the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006 was 6.50% and 6.82%, respectively.
We
intend
to retain the ability to raise additional capital, including public debt or
equity, to pursue attractive investment opportunities that may arise and to
otherwise act in a manner that we believe to be in our shareholders’ best
interests. During the third quarter of 2006, we updated our shelf registration
as a well known seasoned issuer where we will be able to register unspecified
amounts of different classes of securities on Form S-3. To generate capital
to
reinvest into other attractive investment opportunities, we may also consider
the use of additional operational and developmental joint ventures, the sale
or
lease of outparcels on our existing properties and the sale of certain
properties that do not meet our long-term investment criteria.
We
maintain unsecured, revolving lines of credit that provided for unsecured
borrowings of up to $200 million at March 31, 2007. All of our lines of credit
have maturity dates of June 2009 or later. Based on cash provided by operations,
existing credit facilities, ongoing negotiations with certain financial
institutions and our ability to sell debt or equity subject to market
conditions, we believe that we have access to the necessary financing to fund
the planned capital expenditures during 2007.
We
anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and
administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment
of
dividends in accordance with Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) requirements
in both the short and long term. Although we receive most of our rental payments
on a monthly basis, distributions to shareholders are made quarterly and
interest payments on the senior, unsecured notes are made semi-annually. Amounts
accumulated for such payments will be used in the interim to reduce the
outstanding borrowings under the existing lines of credit or invested in
short-term money market or other suitable instruments.
On
April
12, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a $.36 cash dividend per common share
payable on May 15, 2007 to each shareholder of record on April 30, 2007, and
caused a $.72 per Operating Partnership unit cash distribution to be paid to
the
Operating Partnership’s minority interest. The Board of Directors also declared
a $.46875 cash dividend per 7.5% Class C Cumulative Preferred Share payable
on
May 15, 2007 to holders of record on April 30, 2007.
20
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
are a
party to a joint and several guarantee with respect to the $30.25 million
construction loan obtained by Tanger
Wisconsin Dells during the first quarter of 2006. We are also a party to a
joint
and several guarantee with respect to the loan obtained by Deer Park which
currently has a balance of $38.8 million. See “Joint Ventures” section above for
further discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements and their related
guarantees. Our pro-rata portion of the TWMB Associates, LLC, or TWMB, mortgage
secured by the center is $17.9 million. We are not required to
provide a guarantee of the TWMB mortgage.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Refer
to
our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our critical accounting
policies which include principles of consolidation, acquisition of real estate,
cost capitalization, impairment of long-lived assets and revenue recognition.
There have been no material changes to these policies in 2007.
21
Related
Party Transactions
As
noted
above in “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures”, we are 50% owners of each of the TWMB
and Tanger Wisconsin Dells joint ventures. TWMB and Tanger Wisconsin Dells
pay
us management, leasing, marketing and development fees, which we believe
approximate current market rates, for services provided to the joint venture.
The following management, leasing, marketing and development fees were
recognized from services provided to TWMB and Tanger Wisconsin Dells during
the
quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
Three
months
|
||||
Ended
March 31,
|
||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||
Fee:
|
||||
Management
|
$
120
|
$
78
|
||
Leasing
|
25
|
3
|
||
Marketing
|
29
|
18
|
||
Development
|
---
|
97
|
||
Total
Fees
|
$
174
|
$
196
|
Tanger
Family Limited Partnership, or TFLP, is a related party which holds a limited
partnership interest in, and is the minority owner of, the Operating
Partnership. Stanley K. Tanger, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, is the sole general partner of TFLP. The only material
related party transaction with TFLP is the payment of quarterly distributions
of
earnings which were $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes--an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, or FIN 48, which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN
48
requires that we recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial
statements only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained
on
audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN
48
are effective as of January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change
in
accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.
As
a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized no adjustment in
retained earnings for unrecognized income tax benefits. The company had no
provision for uncertain income tax benefits prior to adoption of FIN 48, and
this remained unchanged. The tax years 2003 - 2006 remain open to examination
by
the major tax jurisdictions to which we are subject.
22
Funds
From Operations
Funds
from Operations, which we refer to as FFO, represents income before
extraordinary items and gains (losses) on sale or disposal of depreciable
operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization uniquely significant
to
real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures.
FFO
is
intended to exclude historical cost depreciation of real estate as required
by
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which we refer to as GAAP, which
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time.
Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market
conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real
estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items,
it
provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects
the
impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating
costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not
immediately apparent from net income.
We
present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our
operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, any of which
present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is widely used by us and others
in
our industry to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. The
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc., of which we are
a
member, has encouraged its member companies to report their FFO as a
supplemental, industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance.
In
addition, a percentage of bonus compensation to certain members of management
is
based on our FFO performance.
FFO
has
significant limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider
it in
isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under
GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
§ |
FFO
does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for
capital expenditures or contractual
commitments;
|
§ |
FFO
does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital
needs;
|
§ |
Although
depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being
depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future,
and FFO does not reflect any cash requirements for such
replacements;
|
§ |
FFO
does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from
matters
which may not be indicative of our ongoing operations;
and
|
§ |
Other
companies in our industry may calculate FFO differently than we do,
limiting its usefulness as a comparative
measure.
|
Because
of these limitations, FFO should not be considered as a measure of discretionary
cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or our dividend
paying capacity. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on
our
GAAP results and using FFO only supplementally.
23
Below
is
a reconciliation of FFO to net income for the three months ended March 31,
2007
and 2006 as well as other data for those respective periods (in
thousands):
Funds
From Operations Reconciliation
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,281
|
$$
|
14,847
|
|||||
Adjusted
for:
|
|||||||||
Minority
interest in operating partnership
|
370
|
381
|
|||||||
Minority
interest, depreciation and amortization
|
|||||||||
attributable
to discontinued operations
|
---
|
2,444
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization uniquely significant to
|
|||||||||
real
estate - consolidated
|
18,412
|
15,885
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization uniquely significant to
|
|||||||||
real
estate - unconsolidated joint ventures
|
654
|
379
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of real estate
|
---
|
(13,833
|
)
|
||||||
Funds
from operations (FFO) (1)
|
22,717
|
20,103
|
|||||||
Preferred
share dividends
|
(1,406
|
)
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|||||
Funds
from operations available to common shareholders
|
$
|
21,311
|
$$
|
18,888
|
|||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding (2)
|
37,616
|
36,928
|
(1) |
The
three months ended March 31, 2006 includes gains on sales of outparcels
of
land of $110.
|
(2) |
Includes
the dilutive effect of share and unit options, restricted share awards
and
exchangeable notes and assumes the partnership units of the Operating
Partnership held by the minority interest are converted to common
shares
of the Company.
|
24
Economic
Conditions and Outlook
The
majority of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the impact of
inflation. Such provisions include clauses for the escalation of base rent
and
clauses enabling us to receive percentage rentals based on tenants' gross sales
(above predetermined levels, which we believe often are lower than traditional
retail industry standards) that generally increase as prices rise. Most of
the
leases require the tenant to pay their share of property operating expenses,
including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and advertising
and promotion, thereby reducing exposure to increases in costs and operating
expenses resulting from inflation.
While
factory outlet stores continue to be a profitable and fundamental distribution
channel for brand name manufacturers, some retail formats are more successful
than others. As typical in the retail industry, certain tenants have closed,
or
will close certain stores by terminating their lease prior to its natural
expiration or as a result of filing for protection under bankruptcy
laws.
During
2007, we have approximately 1,550,000 square feet, or 19% of our portfolio,
coming up for renewal. If we were unable to successfully renew or re-lease
a
significant amount of this space on favorable economic terms, the loss in rent
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
As
of
March 31, 2007, we have renewed approximately 734,000 square feet, or 47% of
the
square feet scheduled to expire in 2007. The existing tenants have renewed
at an
average base rental rate approximately 13% higher than the expiring rate. We
also re-tenanted approximately 321,000 square feet of vacant space during the
first three months of 2007 at a 37% increase in the average base rental rate
from that which was previously charged. Our factory outlet centers typically
include well-known, national, brand name companies. By maintaining a broad
base
of creditworthy tenants and a geographically diverse portfolio of properties
located across the United States, we reduce our operating and leasing risks.
No
one tenant (including affiliates) accounted for more than 5.5% of our combined
base and percentage rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Accordingly, we do not expect any material adverse impact on our results of
operations and financial condition as a result of leases to be renewed or stores
to be re-leased.
As
of
March 31, 2007 and 2006, our centers were 95% occupied. Consistent with our
long-term strategy of re-merchandising centers, we will continue to hold space
off the market until an appropriate tenant is identified. While we believe
this
strategy will add value to our centers in the long-term, it may reduce our
average occupancy rates in the near term.
25
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
Market
Risk
We
are
exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates. Market
risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and
prices, such as interest rates. We may periodically enter into certain interest
rate protection and interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert
floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis and to hedge anticipated future
financings. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments
for
trading or speculative purposes.
In
September 2005, we entered into two forward starting interest rate lock
protection agreements to hedge risks related to anticipated future financings
in
2005 and 2008. The 2005 agreement locked the US Treasury index rate at 4.279%
on
a notional amount of $125 million for 10 years from such date in December 2005.
This lock was unwound in the fourth quarter of 2005 in conjunction with the
issuance of the $250 million senior unsecured notes due in 2015 and, as a
result, we received a cash payment of $3.2 million. The gain was recorded in
other comprehensive income and is being amortized into earnings using the
effective interest method over a 10 year period that coincides with the interest
payments associated with the senior unsecured notes due in 2015. The 2008
agreement locked the US Treasury index rate at 4.526% on a notional amount
of
$100 million for 10 years from such date in July 2008. In November 2005, we
entered into an additional agreement which locked the US Treasury index rate
at
4.715% on a notional amount of $100 million for 10 years from such date in
July
2008. We anticipate unsecured debt transactions of at least the notional amount
to occur in the designated periods.
The
fair
value of the interest rate protection agreements represents the estimated
receipts or payments that would be made to terminate the agreement. At March
31,
2007, we would have paid approximately $213,000 if we terminated the agreements.
If the US Treasury rate index decreased 1% and we were to terminate the
agreements, we would have to pay an additional $15.6 million to do so. The
fair
value is based on dealer quotes, considering current interest rates and
remaining term to maturity. We do not intend to terminate the agreements prior
to their maturity because we plan on entering into the debt transactions as
indicated.
During
March 2005, TWMB, entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional
amount of $35 million for five years to hedge floating rate debt on the
permanent financing that was obtained in April 2005. Under this agreement,
TWMB
receives a floating interest rate based on the 30 day LIBOR index and pays
a
fixed interest rate of 4.59%. This swap effectively changes the rate of interest
on $35 million of variable rate mortgage debt to a fixed rate of 5.99% for
the
contract period.
The
fair
value of the interest rate swap agreement represents the estimated receipts
or
payments that would be made to terminate the agreement. At March 31, 2007,
TWMB
would have received approximately $244,000 if the agreement was terminated.
If
the LIBOR index decreased 1% and we were to terminate the agreement, we would
have to pay $757,000 to do so. The fair value is based on dealer quotes,
considering current interest rates and remaining term to maturity. TWMB does
not
intend to terminate the interest rate swap agreement prior to its maturity.
The
fair value of this derivative is currently recorded as an asset in TWMB’s
balance sheet; however, if held to maturity, the value of the swap will be
zero
at that time.
26
The
fair
market value of long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to market risk.
Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase
as
interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The estimated fair
value of our total long-term debt at March 31, 2007 was $709.8 million and
its
recorded value was $677.0 million. A
1%
increase or decrease from prevailing interest rates at March 31, 2007 would
result in a corresponding decrease or increase in fair value of total long-term
debt by approximately $43.0 million. Fair
values were determined from quoted market prices, where available, using current
interest rates considering credit ratings and the remaining terms to
maturity.
The
following table summarizes the notional values and fair values of our derivative
financial instruments as of March 31, 2007.
Financial
Instrument Type
|
Notional
Value
|
Rate
|
Maturity
|
Fair
Value
|
||
TANGER
PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
||||||
US
Treasury Lock
|
$100,000,000
|
4.526%
|
July
2008
|
$
|
516,000
|
|
US
Treasury Lock
|
$100,000,000
|
4.715%
|
July
2008
|
$
|
(729,000
|
)
|
TWMB,
ASSOCIATES, LLC
|
||||||
LIBOR
Interest Rate Swap (1)
|
$35,000,000
|
4.59%
|
March
2010
|
$
|
244,000
|
(1)
Amount represents fair value at TWMB Associates, LLC, in which we have a 50%
ownership interest.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Based
on
the most recent evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were
effective as of March 31, 2007. There were no changes to the Company’s internal
controls over financial reporting during the first quarter ended March 31,
2007,
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
27
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
Neither
the Company nor the Operating Partnership is presently involved in any material
litigation nor, to their knowledge, is any material litigation threatened
against the Company or the Operating Partnership or its properties, other than
routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business and which is
expected to be covered by liability insurance.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk
Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
31.1
|
Principal
Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
Principal
Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1
|
Principal
Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2
|
Principal
Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,
as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
TANGER
FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC.
By: /s/
Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
Frank
C.
Marchisello, Jr.
Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
DATE:
May
3, 2007
28
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No.
Description
__________________________________________________________________________________
31.1
|
Principal
Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2 |
Principal
Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1 |
Principal
Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2 |
Principal
Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of
2002.
|
29